Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 1068714" data-attributes="member: 7261">Why wouldn't Bahk be part of the conversation?  The Packers gave him a huge contract, with a ton of it guaranteed.  It didn't work out.  If his age was a factor and his play, as you say, was on the decline, why was he given all that money?  Fortunately, the Packers didn't give up high draft picks to obtain Bahk. Jones?  What did the Chiefs initially invest in him?  Pick #37.  His contracts have worked out well for the Chiefs.  It has also helped that Jones has been a virtual iron man, only missing 7 games in his 9 year career.There are plenty of players that play past 33 and plenty of players that don't play past 26.  So as you say, you can't cherry pick, but have to look at what can happen and does.  I hope Parsons plays at a pro bowl level and is healthy for his entire time in Green Bay.  However, there is a risk that he doesn't fulfill both of those things, health and good play.My main point is not really about Micah Parsons, but more about investing as much as the Packers just did in 1 player.</blockquote>

Total: 983 (members: 2, guests: 981)