Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Parsons Trade
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1068439" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>You can argue that it’s not a great deal for the Packers*, but it’s almost certainly a BAD deal for the cowboys. We might not have “won” but they certainly lost. </p><p>To say nothing of the financials, if you can give two firsts and Clark for Parsons, that’s a deal you make 11 times out of 10. </p><p>And a very good team adding a player like Parsons in all likelihood ensures those are late first rounders to begin with. </p><p></p><p>I hear all the time when people claim that Gute hasn’t drafted many elite impact players in the first - the rebuttal is “well we are usually drafting late in the first when there aren’t many blue chip prospects left” and/or “there are only 15 or so true first round prospects on average in a given draft, so when we’re picking there’s probably not even a first round graded player left. It’s basically line picking early in the second”</p><p></p><p>Well, good news then. Following that line of logic we basically just gave up two “early seconds” or two “probably not even a first round grade” players</p><p></p><p>(*I’m not making that argument personally but I guess I can see it)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 1068439, member: 17987"] You can argue that it’s not a great deal for the Packers*, but it’s almost certainly a BAD deal for the cowboys. We might not have “won” but they certainly lost. To say nothing of the financials, if you can give two firsts and Clark for Parsons, that’s a deal you make 11 times out of 10. And a very good team adding a player like Parsons in all likelihood ensures those are late first rounders to begin with. I hear all the time when people claim that Gute hasn’t drafted many elite impact players in the first - the rebuttal is “well we are usually drafting late in the first when there aren’t many blue chip prospects left” and/or “there are only 15 or so true first round prospects on average in a given draft, so when we’re picking there’s probably not even a first round graded player left. It’s basically line picking early in the second” Well, good news then. Following that line of logic we basically just gave up two “early seconds” or two “probably not even a first round grade” players (*I’m not making that argument personally but I guess I can see it) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 8:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Parsons Trade
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top