Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1076851" data-attributes="member: 10086">Yes. However we’ve all watched enough Packer games to understand that we take a little longer to get fully primed. We’re talking about Week 3 or week 4 which is the 1st Qtr of the season. Heck even K.C. Was inconsistent around that same timeframe. Should we write KC off or say they are unstable?  Obviously not, all teams stumble some here n there. It’s not ultimately who KC is though. It’s not really who GB is either. Even our lone Loss took every last second of gameclock and several Packer mishaps to give it away. It happens. Heck the Jaguars beat KC In week 5 and they’re no model of perfection. LA just pounded Jacksonville into the dirt. This is Jacksonville since hosting KC (across 8 Quarters)Punt, Punt, TD, Punt, missed FG,Punt, Punt, TD, Punt, Punt, Punt, Punt, Punt, Missed FG, Downs, Downs, Downs, Punt, Punt, TD, DownsCan you imagine if the Packers had 11 straight drives with ZERO points? There’d be a complete meltdown of biblical proportions.  That’s who beat KC in Jacksonville. KC is no different than GB in that they can’t overcome an Offensive Turnover for points and 13 self inflicted Flags for -105 yards. KC essentially did exactly what GB was doing. Slop ball, hurting themselves with drive killers and letting an inferior team hand around.</blockquote>

Total: 377 (members: 4, guests: 373)