Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers vs Buccaneers Game Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 970540" data-attributes="member: 4199"><p>I find these kind of statements overly simple, but I find most statements overly simple.</p><p></p><p>To my eye, MLF came in with a good plan and caught the Bucs on their heels. 3 great drives and a likely 21 points if Jones doesn't fumble ( hard to tell exactly where he would have landed had he retained possession.) The Bucs understood how we were attacking them and clamped down.</p><p></p><p>I think we can all agree on the above.</p><p></p><p>To you who say we didn't adjust: What things did the Bucs take away? How did they do so? What openings did the Bucs' adjustments create? How did we fail to attack those resulting openings? What should we have done instead?</p><p></p><p>My opinion: The Bucs identified our biggest weakness (RG), played tight and forced us to beat them over the top. The remaining options were limited. Our running game was largely stuffed the entire game (2.0 ypc?), we lacked our two deep threats (Watson and Watkins), and were able to pass rush over the RG without concern. In short, the usual counters to these situations were taken away due to our lack of personnel and excellent play by the Bucs. Even the kinds of plays that worked against Chicago were unlikely to work here due to the excellent speed of the Buc linebackers.</p><p></p><p>The two small things that I think could have helped, but I'm not 100% on since I haven't seen (and likely won't see) All-22 camera footage, were lineup in base (Dillon at TB, Deguara at FB, Big Dog at TE) and try to run some lead plays up the gut. This plays into Tampa's strength (defensive line, NT in particular) but might negate the speed at ILB. If that works out, try to run a little play action from that same grouping.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mradtke66, post: 970540, member: 4199"] I find these kind of statements overly simple, but I find most statements overly simple. To my eye, MLF came in with a good plan and caught the Bucs on their heels. 3 great drives and a likely 21 points if Jones doesn't fumble ( hard to tell exactly where he would have landed had he retained possession.) The Bucs understood how we were attacking them and clamped down. I think we can all agree on the above. To you who say we didn't adjust: What things did the Bucs take away? How did they do so? What openings did the Bucs' adjustments create? How did we fail to attack those resulting openings? What should we have done instead? My opinion: The Bucs identified our biggest weakness (RG), played tight and forced us to beat them over the top. The remaining options were limited. Our running game was largely stuffed the entire game (2.0 ypc?), we lacked our two deep threats (Watson and Watkins), and were able to pass rush over the RG without concern. In short, the usual counters to these situations were taken away due to our lack of personnel and excellent play by the Bucs. Even the kinds of plays that worked against Chicago were unlikely to work here due to the excellent speed of the Buc linebackers. The two small things that I think could have helped, but I'm not 100% on since I haven't seen (and likely won't see) All-22 camera footage, were lineup in base (Dillon at TB, Deguara at FB, Big Dog at TE) and try to run some lead plays up the gut. This plays into Tampa's strength (defensive line, NT in particular) but might negate the speed at ILB. If that works out, try to run a little play action from that same grouping. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Heyjoe4
15 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
31 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Today at 1:11 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 1:59 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers vs Buccaneers Game Thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
