Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers vs Browns Studs n Duds
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1072086" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Personally I would’ve brought out an extra OL as eligible. Using a heavy Package.</p><p>1TE, 6 OL, 1 RB, 2 WR, QB.</p><p>They were loading the box with 8 regular and we stayed with a light Package. Having 7 big bodies upfront would’ve also allowed Players to stay Home in their lane to mitigate the stunts. Not to mention they’re got to match our 6 BY 310-325 pounders. Use our size that’s why we went BIG</p><p>Love rarely had time to look past 2 reads, so that extra 1-1.5 seconds to read and react. Plus it allows the RB or TE to leak out if needed. Love had to throw before the route developed, that’s what I was seeing.</p><p>THAT would’ve also allowed us to take several more shots past 20+ yards to keep them honest. Similar to vs. Washington.</p><p>Keep our WR on opposite sidelines and make the lone deep Safety choose his type of death. Use Tucker as an HBack as the lead blocker on Runs. Then take some longer 30+ timing throws to the 1 on 1, especially in 3rd n Forever which we put ourselves in regularly. </p><p></p><p>We tried to box with Finesse, body shots instead of punching them in the Nose.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1072086, member: 10086"] Personally I would’ve brought out an extra OL as eligible. Using a heavy Package. 1TE, 6 OL, 1 RB, 2 WR, QB. They were loading the box with 8 regular and we stayed with a light Package. Having 7 big bodies upfront would’ve also allowed Players to stay Home in their lane to mitigate the stunts. Not to mention they’re got to match our 6 BY 310-325 pounders. Use our size that’s why we went BIG Love rarely had time to look past 2 reads, so that extra 1-1.5 seconds to read and react. Plus it allows the RB or TE to leak out if needed. Love had to throw before the route developed, that’s what I was seeing. THAT would’ve also allowed us to take several more shots past 20+ yards to keep them honest. Similar to vs. Washington. Keep our WR on opposite sidelines and make the lone deep Safety choose his type of death. Use Tucker as an HBack as the lead blocker on Runs. Then take some longer 30+ timing throws to the 1 on 1, especially in 3rd n Forever which we put ourselves in regularly. We tried to box with Finesse, body shots instead of punching them in the Nose. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
Capitol 8805
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
43 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: CarryTheG14
Today at 11:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:10 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:09 AM
Movies and Entertainment
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:48 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers vs Browns Studs n Duds
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top