Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="sschind" data-source="post: 1038242" data-attributes="member: 10247">I will preface this by saying I did not watch the game so take it for what its worth.  I guess its disappointing but I don't expect much from the least important 3 hours of football in the entire year ( 2nd preseason game.) You've got guys who might be decent backups but they are playing with complete scrubs so sometimes they don't look so good.  Put them in with your number 1s as an injury replacement and all of a sudden they look a lot better.  When one guy is lost it can affect others.  When your weakest link is the first guy off the bench he can look a whole lot better than when he is the best guy on the field.  I think you get my point. Did the QBs look that bad or did it maybe have something to do with the fact that the best WR on the field is battling for the #5 spot.  Of the 11 guys who had targets the two who I would say have the best chances to make the team are our #4RB and #3TE and the RBs chances hinge on the injury to Lloyd.Just take a look at the 31 players who didn't even dress for the game.  I think it was every one of our #1s and a few key backups.  I know you want to see the guys who are playing play well but sometimes a pig is just a pig.  The worst part about this game is the fuel it will give Bears fans.</blockquote>

Total: 330 (members: 3, guests: 327)