Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1083783" data-attributes="member: 17987">I would largely tend to agree.On offense, we scored on our first five possessions, but "only" 2 TD and 3 FG. Of course this is still a good thing overall but it's also basically like leaving 2 TD on the table. Turn a couple of those FGs in to TDs and the whole game makeup is radically changed. But no matter, that wasn't the deciding factor either IMO. Yes Nix had a great day, and our secondary wasn't awesome. But in no small part due to Tom going out, the wheels absolutely FELL OFF our offense in the second half. Parsons loss will absolutely hurt but we 100% could've won that game if our offense had been able to do basically ANYTHING to close out the game. Here's our second-half offense. We open with a 71 yard drive that's capped off by a 40 yard TD from Jacobs. That puts us up 23-14. After that?1 play, 0 yards, INT (9 seconds)6 plays, 11 yards, Punt (4m16s)9 plays, 46 yards, FG (4m05s)2 plays, 2 yards, INT (56s)7 plays, 1 yard, downs (2m31s)4 plays, -5 yards, downs (23s)That's 29 plays for 55 yards, two INT, two turnovers on downs, a punt and a field goal. 1.89 yards per play on offense in the second half following that TD drive... like I said IMO if we do pretty much anything more on offense we probably are at worst able to sneak away with a close win</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 354 (members: 0, guests: 354)