Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Vikings Game Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1087633" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>It’s possible you don’t have to. I looked into that because you saw live game thread I was complaining about that also. Yet later I looked and I felt a little embarrassed.</p><p></p><p>Golden had 76 snaps over the last 2 weeks to Melton’s 30 snaps on Offense only. Bo played in 2 other contests with meaningful snaps (26,11). In both contests Mathew Golden was not active so take that out of the equation for argument (If memory serves me Golden had a minor injury in Nov that held him back 11/10 and 11/27). So it would be an unfounded argument to say he replaced Matthew due to performance issues.</p><p></p><p>Now of the 30 snaps Melton got when Golden was on the active 47? 13 came in a game where we featured almost exclusively depth players at Minnesota. I’m pretty sure both players had snaps at MN that overlapped with both on the field.</p><p></p><p>That leaves <strong>1</strong> game (Ravens) with Bo getting 17 snaps and Golden had 25 snaps (53% of the total snaps). Yet let’s look closer. here because this was the game I similarly complained in the live thread that Bo was out there. GB ran a season low 44 plays total! We literally had the ball for 19:00 to Baltimore 41:00. I don’t pretend to know for certain, but I’m guessing naturally several plays both were on the field together. So we are talking about ~15 snaps or less snaps this season where Bo was featured over Golden. Even on that tiny sample we have no idea the reason. Could’ve been Golden got nicked up I don’t recall, but it’s still a frivolous number to complain about.</p><p></p><p>So I was wrong. I made a comment that was largely unfounded last week. This week, I was frustrated after hearing our OC say Golden role would be somehow minimal in Postseason. The more I thought about that the more I still find that statement to reporters odd though, don’t you??</p><p> Why would our Sten give away battle plans to Chicago? Or Philly?</p><p></p><p>I rewatched that interview. Sten has a brilliant poker face but he changed subjects to quickly for me to buy the smoke n mirrors. Sten appears to lie almost as good as me but I can hold a lie longer! Love that guy</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1087633, member: 10086"] It’s possible you don’t have to. I looked into that because you saw live game thread I was complaining about that also. Yet later I looked and I felt a little embarrassed. Golden had 76 snaps over the last 2 weeks to Melton’s 30 snaps on Offense only. Bo played in 2 other contests with meaningful snaps (26,11). In both contests Mathew Golden was not active so take that out of the equation for argument (If memory serves me Golden had a minor injury in Nov that held him back 11/10 and 11/27). So it would be an unfounded argument to say he replaced Matthew due to performance issues. Now of the 30 snaps Melton got when Golden was on the active 47? 13 came in a game where we featured almost exclusively depth players at Minnesota. I’m pretty sure both players had snaps at MN that overlapped with both on the field. That leaves [B]1[/B] game (Ravens) with Bo getting 17 snaps and Golden had 25 snaps (53% of the total snaps). Yet let’s look closer. here because this was the game I similarly complained in the live thread that Bo was out there. GB ran a season low 44 plays total! We literally had the ball for 19:00 to Baltimore 41:00. I don’t pretend to know for certain, but I’m guessing naturally several plays both were on the field together. So we are talking about ~15 snaps or less snaps this season where Bo was featured over Golden. Even on that tiny sample we have no idea the reason. Could’ve been Golden got nicked up I don’t recall, but it’s still a frivolous number to complain about. So I was wrong. I made a comment that was largely unfounded last week. This week, I was frustrated after hearing our OC say Golden role would be somehow minimal in Postseason. The more I thought about that the more I still find that statement to reporters odd though, don’t you?? Why would our Sten give away battle plans to Chicago? Or Philly? I rewatched that interview. Sten has a brilliant poker face but he changed subjects to quickly for me to buy the smoke n mirrors. Sten appears to lie almost as good as me but I can hold a lie longer! Love that guy [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
53 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:52 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: milani
Today at 5:43 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: milani
Today at 5:37 PM
Movies and Entertainment
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Magooch
Today at 4:05 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Vikings Game Thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
