Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers v Titans Game Thread: Thursday Night Football Edition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 980273" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>It looked like a catch (on slo motion) Thats a key additive. Slow motion. When they go slow motion it always seems to look more cut n dry. At real time speed those are bang bang plays and it’s my belief that the time (or lack of) factors into the referees decision process.</p><p>I’m going to assume (because I can’t remember) that the play was called “not a catch” because he didn’t maintain control through the ground because it was interfered by our player. If I recall their Coach was going to challenge until the booth revised the call?</p><p></p><p>My only question? Someone else brought this up. Had the ball come out <strong>without</strong> a Defender around is that a catch? I don’t believe so by rule. Regardless if it pops by itself or by a defender…. it needs to be definitive. I think had the ball come out identical to Ford’s timing? That the play stands incomplete. I’m not saying it’s a good rule, but it is the rule</p><p></p><p>Anyway the referee normally holds the tie breaker and unless it’s clear it should stand. They thought it was a conclusive catch, I’m ok with it was close leaning a catch.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 980273, member: 10086"] It looked like a catch (on slo motion) Thats a key additive. Slow motion. When they go slow motion it always seems to look more cut n dry. At real time speed those are bang bang plays and it’s my belief that the time (or lack of) factors into the referees decision process. I’m going to assume (because I can’t remember) that the play was called “not a catch” because he didn’t maintain control through the ground because it was interfered by our player. If I recall their Coach was going to challenge until the booth revised the call? My only question? Someone else brought this up. Had the ball come out [B]without[/B] a Defender around is that a catch? I don’t believe so by rule. Regardless if it pops by itself or by a defender…. it needs to be definitive. I think had the ball come out identical to Ford’s timing? That the play stands incomplete. I’m not saying it’s a good rule, but it is the rule Anyway the referee normally holds the tie breaker and unless it’s clear it should stand. They thought it was a conclusive catch, I’m ok with it was close leaning a catch. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 7:06 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 5:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 1:59 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:55 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers v Titans Game Thread: Thursday Night Football Edition
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top