Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers v Titans Game Thread: Thursday Night Football Edition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 980149" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>I agree with that interpretation. At some point the ruling is left to interpretation. By the rule you could easily argue the Ford INT was not a catch but an INT. He didn't retain control "through the ground". Watching the replay? you could rule it was a catch but wasn't it initially ruled incomplete? If so, it should not have been overturned because it's an interpretation and ruled incomplete.</p><p>To me it's really no different than the Dez no catch, when you watch that he has control and is making a football move (turned to reach for the chalk) and is even already touched by Shields when going down. The second he touches the ground that should've stopped the play because he turned and reached (although that "no catch" did not decide that game as there was a ton of time left in the contest, so it was immaterial either way)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 980149, member: 10086"] I agree with that interpretation. At some point the ruling is left to interpretation. By the rule you could easily argue the Ford INT was not a catch but an INT. He didn't retain control "through the ground". Watching the replay? you could rule it was a catch but wasn't it initially ruled incomplete? If so, it should not have been overturned because it's an interpretation and ruled incomplete. To me it's really no different than the Dez no catch, when you watch that he has control and is making a football move (turned to reach for the chalk) and is even already touched by Shields when going down. The second he touches the ground that should've stopped the play because he turned and reached (although that "no catch" did not decide that game as there was a ton of time left in the contest, so it was immaterial either way) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
coulomb
Latest posts
Kentucky Derby Day!
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 8:00 PM
All Other Sports
Transfer Portal and How It Has Changed College Sports
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 7:44 PM
College Sports
C
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 2:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 2:24 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 12:47 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers v Titans Game Thread: Thursday Night Football Edition
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top