Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers tried to trade for Jonathan Taylor
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 1004622" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>As I was discussing with [USER=16827]@Schultz[/USER], I think the Packers kind of straddled the "All-In With Rodgers" and "keeping an eye on the future". Now some might say they did a poor job at doing either, but I actually think the opposite. While they didn't do a perfect job on the all-in side or they would have won a SB or 2, but they did put themselves into position for it quite a few times. Hard to argue that back to back 13 win seasons isn't close to being on top of the mountain. A break here or there and they win those NFCCG's. </p><p></p><p>What they did a really good job on though, is being prepared for life without Rodgers. They never had a super solid exit plan for Rodgers, but Gute and the Packers knew it wasn't that far away when they drafted Love. </p><p></p><p>Now we won't really know how the "keeping an eye on the future" part of the approach works out just yet. However, here we sit, 4 1/2 months after Rodgers was traded and the Packers appear to be in pretty good shape, as long as that key piece, Rodgers replacement works out. Not a lot of teams have been able to do that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokerbrat2000, post: 1004622, member: 7261"] As I was discussing with [USER=16827]@Schultz[/USER], I think the Packers kind of straddled the "All-In With Rodgers" and "keeping an eye on the future". Now some might say they did a poor job at doing either, but I actually think the opposite. While they didn't do a perfect job on the all-in side or they would have won a SB or 2, but they did put themselves into position for it quite a few times. Hard to argue that back to back 13 win seasons isn't close to being on top of the mountain. A break here or there and they win those NFCCG's. What they did a really good job on though, is being prepared for life without Rodgers. They never had a super solid exit plan for Rodgers, but Gute and the Packers knew it wasn't that far away when they drafted Love. Now we won't really know how the "keeping an eye on the future" part of the approach works out just yet. However, here we sit, 4 1/2 months after Rodgers was traded and the Packers appear to be in pretty good shape, as long as that key piece, Rodgers replacement works out. Not a lot of teams have been able to do that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
58 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 11:57 AM
Movies and Entertainment
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 11:08 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:07 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:43 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers tried to trade for Jonathan Taylor
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top