Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 1004454" data-attributes="member: 7261">I agree about the Packers not being built for smash mouth football.  However, I do think our O-Line is better than it seems to be getting credited for.  I prefer an OL that is above average at both run and pass blocking, which I think is what we have in GB.  All that said, Jonathan Taylor would probably be a very good back for the Packers, but I wouldn't have wanted the Packers giving up the resources it would require to have both him and Jones running the ball.One article I read did make some sense of it though.  Both AJ's might be gone after this season, due to an expiring contract (Dillon) and last year contract with a big cap hit ($17.7M) with Aaron Jones.  Had the trade been done, it would have been getting Taylor in advance of potentially needing someone like him in 2024.  Maybe had it been Dillon and a day 3 pick, along with a decent reworked contract, might have been worth it.  Guessing JT is looking for a lot of guaranteed money, as well as one of the top RB per year deals.  I'll take my chances on finding RB's in 2024 and beyond.</blockquote>

Total: 110 (members: 3, guests: 107)