Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Trade Candidates
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1066194" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>I think it’s safe to say that any team can draft better in RD1 so it’s hard not to agree with that. Yet except for the best team its also a bit of a rhetorical statement. Who doesn’t wish their team Drafts better.. in ANY round?</p><p></p><p></p><p>I don’t thing Gutey is that bad using Day1 selections across full spectrum.</p><p></p><p>Was Alexander not a good selection?</p><p>I remember many in here ridiculed The Rashan Gary selection, it turns out they were wrong.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Was Jordan Love a bad selection? QB is by far the most important weighted position for a GM to be graded on. That position alone can outweigh several good Day 1 selections imo.</p><p>How many GM’s have drafted better QB’s without benefit of a Top 20 selection?? I can count 1. He retired 7 seasons ago. Ozzie Newsome (Lamar Jackson). That’s a heck of a selection late Day1.</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.espn.com/nfl/qbr[/URL]</p><p></p><p>So far, right off the bat, Brian Gutenkunst scores high in RD1 for selecting QB using #24 overall. That’s cheap collateral for a good starting QB. That pick is weighted 2X or 3X a regular Day 1 imo.</p><p></p><p>About the only “miss” Gute had was with Stokes at #29 overall. Ok he’s not perfect, but let’s be real it’s not like this was an #7 overall selection here.</p><p>Savage was actually drafted in RD1,but Gute used a 3rd Rounder to acquire him, so it’s hard to ding him there.</p><p></p><p>Wyatt looks pretty good</p><p>Quay looks pretty good.</p><p></p><p>Jury is out on Morgan and Van Ness but those are relatively newer selections and should clear up our grading after this year or next. I don’t pretend to follow every GM. If you told me someone did the research and graded Brian as the #5 best GM in RD1 of current GM’s? I’d say that’s very believable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1066194, member: 10086"] I think it’s safe to say that any team can draft better in RD1 so it’s hard not to agree with that. Yet except for the best team its also a bit of a rhetorical statement. Who doesn’t wish their team Drafts better.. in ANY round? I don’t thing Gutey is that bad using Day1 selections across full spectrum. Was Alexander not a good selection? I remember many in here ridiculed The Rashan Gary selection, it turns out they were wrong. Was Jordan Love a bad selection? QB is by far the most important weighted position for a GM to be graded on. That position alone can outweigh several good Day 1 selections imo. How many GM’s have drafted better QB’s without benefit of a Top 20 selection?? I can count 1. He retired 7 seasons ago. Ozzie Newsome (Lamar Jackson). That’s a heck of a selection late Day1. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.espn.com/nfl/qbr[/URL] So far, right off the bat, Brian Gutenkunst scores high in RD1 for selecting QB using #24 overall. That’s cheap collateral for a good starting QB. That pick is weighted 2X or 3X a regular Day 1 imo. About the only “miss” Gute had was with Stokes at #29 overall. Ok he’s not perfect, but let’s be real it’s not like this was an #7 overall selection here. Savage was actually drafted in RD1,but Gute used a 3rd Rounder to acquire him, so it’s hard to ding him there. Wyatt looks pretty good Quay looks pretty good. Jury is out on Morgan and Van Ness but those are relatively newer selections and should clear up our grading after this year or next. I don’t pretend to follow every GM. If you told me someone did the research and graded Brian as the #5 best GM in RD1 of current GM’s? I’d say that’s very believable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:12 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 10:57 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 3:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 2:00 PM
Movies and Entertainment
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Magooch
Yesterday at 11:43 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Trade Candidates
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
