Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Heyjoe4" data-source="post: 1059080" data-attributes="member: 13032">You and Ty are both making good points.I do like Slayton, but he's gonna cost about $15 mil AAV and he'll want and get a 3 year deal, somewhere.My preference is doing a deal for Metcalf.  Ty rightly points out that this takes Slayton off the table, as the Packers can't/won't pay two receivers approx $45 mil AAV with some worthy players of their own coming up for second contracts.It sounds like  a deal for Metcalf won't require a 1st rounder.  I like that better, and now that Metcalf has publicly asked for a trade, Seattle might have lost leverage to get a #1.  We just need to realize that Metcalf is gonna get $30 mil or so AAV.Absent Metcalf, I'd like to see a deal for Slayton.  The Giants seem to be a team where very good players go to languish.And whether it's Metcalf or Slayton or some other mix of guys, Gluten should take a speedy WR late day 2, early day 3.Im not crazy about Lockett, but if Gluten runs out of options, he could be a decent one-year rental.</blockquote>

Total: 786 (members: 2, guests: 784)