Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers to keep run game, seek help for Grant
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tromadz" data-source="post: 211168" data-attributes="member: 306"><p><a href="http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080224/PKR01/80224033/1057/PKR&located=RSS" target="_blank">linky:</a></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">Packers to keep run game, seek help for Grant</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">By Pete Dougherty</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"><a href="mailto:pdougher@greenbaypressgazette.com">pdougher@greenbaypressgazette.com</a></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">INDIANAPOLIS – Green Bay Packers coach Mike McCarthy has no plans to de-emphasize his zone-run scheme in favor of a more power-oriented rushing attack for the cold climate of Wisconsin.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">McCarthy brought the zone scheme as part of his version of the West Coast offense when General Manager Ted Thompson hired him in 2006. It was a significant departure from the more power-oriented run games of previous coaches Mike Sherman, Ray Rhodes and Mike Holmgren.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">Ryan Grant showed in the second half of last season that a good running back is more important than any particular running scheme, but the Packers still had crucial times when they couldn’t run the ball well enough, including short-yardage situations and most notably in the NFC championship loss to the New York Giants.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">In arctic-like weather at Lambeau Field, a decent running game might have gotten the Packers to the Super Bowl, but Grant gained only 29 yards on 13 carries that day, whereas Giants running backs Brandon Jacobs and Ahmad Bradshaw combined for 130 yards on 37 carries, which was just good enough to control the ball in the bitter cold.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">Nevertheless, with most of the Packers’ self-scouting from last season finished, McCarthy said he has no plans to de-emphasize the zone scheme, in which there’s an emphasis of quickness over bulk in offensive linemen, and blocks mostly are straight ahead with minimal pulling of guard and tackles.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">“Yes, we’re staying with the zone-run scheme,” McCarthy said at the NFL scouting combine last week. “We do run aspects of power schemes that are adjustments to our zone schemes, so that’s why I don’t think that’s a valid criticism, (that) because we play in cold weather we’re running the wrong kind of run-game offense.”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">Though McCarthy’s run game is based on the unique brand of the zone scheme devised by former Kansas City, Denver and Atlanta offensive line coach Alex Gibbs, McCarthy says his version differs because it’s based more on inside runs than the outside runs favored by Gibbs.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">Either way, both schemes emphasize the same kind of blockers, and McCarthy said he wants to stay with the the quickness-oriented linemen.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">One difficulty the Packers have had in their run game is finding a consistent guard tandem since parting ways with Mike Wahle and Marco Rivera, but it doesn’t look like they’re ready to make any major changes there after spending resources and time the last couple of years to put together a stable of young guards.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">Jason Spitz has gone the furthest toward solidifying his starting job after holding that role in his first two years in the league, but Daryn Colledge has been far more inconsistent over that same time at left guard.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">They will compete with at least three other young guards for the starting jobs in 2008.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">Second-year pro Allen Barbre probably is the most physically talented of the group, and the Packers expect him to take a big jump and push hard for a starting role. Fourth-year pro Junius Coston and perhaps second-year pro Tony Palmer also will compete for the jobs. Palmer is the closest thing to a road grader of that group, but the others fit the quicker, more athletic mold that the zone scheme requires.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">“I like the athletic linemen, it gives you more flexibility to do the things I like to do,” McCarthy said. “I like moving the quarterback, I maybe don’t do it as much (as preferred). I also think they’re better pass protectors, and we’ve been very effective throwing the football.”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">Still, that group of young linemen will have to make significant strides in the offseason to give the Packers a more consistent running game that could help get them over the hump and into the Super Bowl.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">Grant did wonders for the run game. His ability to break off long runs sparked the offense several times but it also occasionally masked the team’s inability to run the ball when conditions or down-and-distance demanded it.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">For instance, in their other bitter-cold game last season, a telling loss at Chicago, the Packers gained 125 yards on 21 carries, but 60 of those came on one run, a touchdown by Grant. They gained only 65 yards on their other 20 carries (3.2 yards a carry), which wasn’t much better than Grant’s 2.2-yard average against the Giants in the NFC championship game.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">Perhaps more telling, the Packers ranked last in the NFL in converting on third-and-1 and fourth-and-1 combined.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">But McCarthy insists the zone scheme lends itself to consistency that will come as the offensive line improves.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">“That’s the whole theory of the thing, it keeps you out of negative runs,” he said. “Just in a general sense, when you get into patterned schemes you’re doing so much down blocking, there’s more one-on-one blocking, where in the zone scheme if they don’t make you (block one-on-one) you’re able to double team and get up on the second level (i.e., linebackers), you don’t have as much penetration, you’re not as vulnerable to negative runs. That’s the basic theory the zone scheme.”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">So with the zone scheme, McCarthy will enter 2008 knowing the Packers have one halfback who functions well in the zone scheme in Grant, who runs with surprising power and excellent instincts for the critical quick cutbacks the zone blocking affords.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">In the six games before Grant became the Packers’ primary halfback, they averaged 65.7 yards rushing a game and 3.3 yards a carry. In the 12 games thereafter, playoffs included, they averaged 111.8 yards rushing per game and 4.5 yards a carry.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">It’s still a wonder that a player acquired from the New York Giants for a sixth-round pick just before the start of the season could become such a key player.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">“I’ve got to be careful on that one because I’ll get myself in trouble,’ said Kevin Gilbride, the Giants’ offensive coordinator, when asked whether he could have foreseen Grant becoming so productive.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">“I thought he was a hell of a football player. Now, did I anticipate him being this force that he was? I didn’t know that. But we knew we let go of a good football player, the coaches, so we were certainly sorry to see him go.”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">With all Grant gave them, though, the Packers still seem likely to draft a halfback in attempt to find a second quality runner to pair with him.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">Though McCarthy talked last week about the increased competition at the position with Brandon Jackson entering his second season and DeShawn Wynn having made gains in the weight room since going on injured reserve halfway through last season, neither looks like an every-down type back who could push Grant for the starting job or provide anything close to what Grant does if he gets hurt.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">Jackson didn’t show the explosiveness last season that he did in college at Nebraska, though he catches the ball easily and has the makings of a third-down back.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">There still are major questions about whether Wynn will make it in the NFL, because he still has miles to go to show he’s dependable and committed to football enough to play through the ailments that go with playing halfback in the NFL.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">Even after saying he feels much better about the running back position now than at this time last year, McCarthy suggested the Packers could draft a running back with any pick.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">“As far as taking another one in the draft, if he’s the guy up on the board, I’m sure we have no problem drafting him,” he said.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">There probably are four first-round prospects at halfback, and all appear likely to be gone by the Packers’ pick at No. 30.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">Arkansas’ Darren McFadden probably will be a top-10 pick, maybe even top five. Illinois’ Rashard Mendenhall is looking more and more like a top-20 pick, and Oregon’s Jonathan Stewart is a power back who could go in the top 20 or 25 as well. Arkansas’ Felix Jones was McFadden’s explosive backup and ranks as the second-best back on at least one team’s draft board, though his size (just 200 pounds) could drop him lower in the first round.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">Most of the possible second-rounders are smaller backs such as Texas’ Jamaal Charles (6-foot-1, 200), East Carolina’s fast Chris Johnson (5-10½, 195), West Virginia’s Steve Slaton (5-10, 195) and Rutgers’ Ray Rice (5-9, 195). Central Florida’s Kevin Smith (6-1, 212) is the only second-round back who’s physically built to handle the every-down pounding. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">--------------------------------------</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tromadz, post: 211168, member: 306"] [url=http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080224/PKR01/80224033/1057/PKR&located=RSS]linky:[/url] [size=14] Packers to keep run game, seek help for Grant By Pete Dougherty [email]pdougher@greenbaypressgazette.com[/email] INDIANAPOLIS – Green Bay Packers coach Mike McCarthy has no plans to de-emphasize his zone-run scheme in favor of a more power-oriented rushing attack for the cold climate of Wisconsin. McCarthy brought the zone scheme as part of his version of the West Coast offense when General Manager Ted Thompson hired him in 2006. It was a significant departure from the more power-oriented run games of previous coaches Mike Sherman, Ray Rhodes and Mike Holmgren. Ryan Grant showed in the second half of last season that a good running back is more important than any particular running scheme, but the Packers still had crucial times when they couldn’t run the ball well enough, including short-yardage situations and most notably in the NFC championship loss to the New York Giants. In arctic-like weather at Lambeau Field, a decent running game might have gotten the Packers to the Super Bowl, but Grant gained only 29 yards on 13 carries that day, whereas Giants running backs Brandon Jacobs and Ahmad Bradshaw combined for 130 yards on 37 carries, which was just good enough to control the ball in the bitter cold. Nevertheless, with most of the Packers’ self-scouting from last season finished, McCarthy said he has no plans to de-emphasize the zone scheme, in which there’s an emphasis of quickness over bulk in offensive linemen, and blocks mostly are straight ahead with minimal pulling of guard and tackles. “Yes, we’re staying with the zone-run scheme,” McCarthy said at the NFL scouting combine last week. “We do run aspects of power schemes that are adjustments to our zone schemes, so that’s why I don’t think that’s a valid criticism, (that) because we play in cold weather we’re running the wrong kind of run-game offense.” Though McCarthy’s run game is based on the unique brand of the zone scheme devised by former Kansas City, Denver and Atlanta offensive line coach Alex Gibbs, McCarthy says his version differs because it’s based more on inside runs than the outside runs favored by Gibbs. Either way, both schemes emphasize the same kind of blockers, and McCarthy said he wants to stay with the the quickness-oriented linemen. One difficulty the Packers have had in their run game is finding a consistent guard tandem since parting ways with Mike Wahle and Marco Rivera, but it doesn’t look like they’re ready to make any major changes there after spending resources and time the last couple of years to put together a stable of young guards. Jason Spitz has gone the furthest toward solidifying his starting job after holding that role in his first two years in the league, but Daryn Colledge has been far more inconsistent over that same time at left guard. They will compete with at least three other young guards for the starting jobs in 2008. Second-year pro Allen Barbre probably is the most physically talented of the group, and the Packers expect him to take a big jump and push hard for a starting role. Fourth-year pro Junius Coston and perhaps second-year pro Tony Palmer also will compete for the jobs. Palmer is the closest thing to a road grader of that group, but the others fit the quicker, more athletic mold that the zone scheme requires. “I like the athletic linemen, it gives you more flexibility to do the things I like to do,” McCarthy said. “I like moving the quarterback, I maybe don’t do it as much (as preferred). I also think they’re better pass protectors, and we’ve been very effective throwing the football.” Still, that group of young linemen will have to make significant strides in the offseason to give the Packers a more consistent running game that could help get them over the hump and into the Super Bowl. Grant did wonders for the run game. His ability to break off long runs sparked the offense several times but it also occasionally masked the team’s inability to run the ball when conditions or down-and-distance demanded it. For instance, in their other bitter-cold game last season, a telling loss at Chicago, the Packers gained 125 yards on 21 carries, but 60 of those came on one run, a touchdown by Grant. They gained only 65 yards on their other 20 carries (3.2 yards a carry), which wasn’t much better than Grant’s 2.2-yard average against the Giants in the NFC championship game. Perhaps more telling, the Packers ranked last in the NFL in converting on third-and-1 and fourth-and-1 combined. But McCarthy insists the zone scheme lends itself to consistency that will come as the offensive line improves. “That’s the whole theory of the thing, it keeps you out of negative runs,” he said. “Just in a general sense, when you get into patterned schemes you’re doing so much down blocking, there’s more one-on-one blocking, where in the zone scheme if they don’t make you (block one-on-one) you’re able to double team and get up on the second level (i.e., linebackers), you don’t have as much penetration, you’re not as vulnerable to negative runs. That’s the basic theory the zone scheme.” So with the zone scheme, McCarthy will enter 2008 knowing the Packers have one halfback who functions well in the zone scheme in Grant, who runs with surprising power and excellent instincts for the critical quick cutbacks the zone blocking affords. In the six games before Grant became the Packers’ primary halfback, they averaged 65.7 yards rushing a game and 3.3 yards a carry. In the 12 games thereafter, playoffs included, they averaged 111.8 yards rushing per game and 4.5 yards a carry. It’s still a wonder that a player acquired from the New York Giants for a sixth-round pick just before the start of the season could become such a key player. “I’ve got to be careful on that one because I’ll get myself in trouble,’ said Kevin Gilbride, the Giants’ offensive coordinator, when asked whether he could have foreseen Grant becoming so productive. “I thought he was a hell of a football player. Now, did I anticipate him being this force that he was? I didn’t know that. But we knew we let go of a good football player, the coaches, so we were certainly sorry to see him go.” With all Grant gave them, though, the Packers still seem likely to draft a halfback in attempt to find a second quality runner to pair with him. Though McCarthy talked last week about the increased competition at the position with Brandon Jackson entering his second season and DeShawn Wynn having made gains in the weight room since going on injured reserve halfway through last season, neither looks like an every-down type back who could push Grant for the starting job or provide anything close to what Grant does if he gets hurt. Jackson didn’t show the explosiveness last season that he did in college at Nebraska, though he catches the ball easily and has the makings of a third-down back. There still are major questions about whether Wynn will make it in the NFL, because he still has miles to go to show he’s dependable and committed to football enough to play through the ailments that go with playing halfback in the NFL. Even after saying he feels much better about the running back position now than at this time last year, McCarthy suggested the Packers could draft a running back with any pick. “As far as taking another one in the draft, if he’s the guy up on the board, I’m sure we have no problem drafting him,” he said. There probably are four first-round prospects at halfback, and all appear likely to be gone by the Packers’ pick at No. 30. Arkansas’ Darren McFadden probably will be a top-10 pick, maybe even top five. Illinois’ Rashard Mendenhall is looking more and more like a top-20 pick, and Oregon’s Jonathan Stewart is a power back who could go in the top 20 or 25 as well. Arkansas’ Felix Jones was McFadden’s explosive backup and ranks as the second-best back on at least one team’s draft board, though his size (just 200 pounds) could drop him lower in the first round. Most of the possible second-rounders are smaller backs such as Texas’ Jamaal Charles (6-foot-1, 200), East Carolina’s fast Chris Johnson (5-10½, 195), West Virginia’s Steve Slaton (5-10, 195) and Rutgers’ Ray Rice (5-9, 195). Central Florida’s Kevin Smith (6-1, 212) is the only second-round back who’s physically built to handle the every-down pounding. --------------------------------------[/size] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
29th pick.. Eric stokes db
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 1:33 AM
Draft Talk
Who Will Start?
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 1:18 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Team Ronny
Yesterday at 10:25 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 9:48 PM
Draft Talk
Time to call Brett back from the woodshed....
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 7:11 PM
Brett Favre Discussion
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers to keep run game, seek help for Grant
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top