Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers to be More Physical
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 496998" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">[killing time before the draft] If Neal and Daniels have limited roles, what was Worthy's role? He was not stout enough vs. the run to play DE in the base well and Neal and Daniels were both better getting pressure on the QB. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">Maybe I can simplify this: </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">Facts: Worthy was picked at #51 in the last draft. Thompson traded picks #59 and #123 to move up to pick him. Daniels was picked with a compensation pick at #132. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">Opinion: Daniels was better than Worthy. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">So it seems odd to me that someone would post they don't understand why the Packers would draft a 6' DL when an example exists from that very same draft of a taller DL who wasn't as good as the shorter DL. Not only that, but Daniels was selected 81 picks after Worthy. In fact, Thompson traded two picks above #132 to select a player not as good as Daniels. So with the benefit of hindsight wouldn't it make more sense to wonder if it wouldn't have made more sense to look at another position with pick #51, or better yet not trade picks #59 and #123 and look at two other positions? [/]</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 496998, member: 4300"] [FONT=Arial][killing time before the draft] If Neal and Daniels have limited roles, what was Worthy's role? He was not stout enough vs. the run to play DE in the base well and Neal and Daniels were both better getting pressure on the QB. [/FONT] [FONT=Arial]Maybe I can simplify this: [/FONT] [FONT=Arial]Facts: Worthy was picked at #51 in the last draft. Thompson traded picks #59 and #123 to move up to pick him. Daniels was picked with a compensation pick at #132. [/FONT] [FONT=Arial]Opinion: Daniels was better than Worthy. [/FONT] [FONT=Arial]So it seems odd to me that someone would post they don't understand why the Packers would draft a 6' DL when an example exists from that very same draft of a taller DL who wasn't as good as the shorter DL. Not only that, but Daniels was selected 81 picks after Worthy. In fact, Thompson traded two picks above #132 to select a player not as good as Daniels. So with the benefit of hindsight wouldn't it make more sense to wonder if it wouldn't have made more sense to look at another position with pick #51, or better yet not trade picks #59 and #123 and look at two other positions? [/][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
G
griffin
Administrator
Members online
griffin
Dukefan12
Latest posts
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
11 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Krabs
16 minutes ago
Draft Talk
M
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: mradtke66
31 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Sanguine camper
37 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
G
I had This Nightmare
Latest: GleefulGary
43 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers to be More Physical
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top