Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers to be More Physical
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Guapo" data-source="post: 496967" data-attributes="member: 5830"><p>I find your remark here curious. Why would Bishop be replaced? He's still our starter. Yes I'd love for all of our backups to be elite players too, but that's not reality.</p><p> </p><p>Collins I agree it would be great to have Collins 2.0 playing back there, but your "adequate" statement leads me to believe that the staff somehow screwed up? While safety is a need, I think that most fans and media would agree that they've had bigger needs for our top draft picks. You can only do so much when looking for safety in the mid-to-late rounds and/or free agency.</p><p> </p><p>As to my original post that Bozz got hammered on, I don't mind his response. His broader point was that when we play aggressive we more often play undisciplined. I can buy that argument. I disagree with the hail mary point mainly because I don't agree that it was an undisciplined play, but I recognize that wasn't the main thrust of his point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Guapo, post: 496967, member: 5830"] I find your remark here curious. Why would Bishop be replaced? He's still our starter. Yes I'd love for all of our backups to be elite players too, but that's not reality. Collins I agree it would be great to have Collins 2.0 playing back there, but your "adequate" statement leads me to believe that the staff somehow screwed up? While safety is a need, I think that most fans and media would agree that they've had bigger needs for our top draft picks. You can only do so much when looking for safety in the mid-to-late rounds and/or free agency. As to my original post that Bozz got hammered on, I don't mind his response. His broader point was that when we play aggressive we more often play undisciplined. I can buy that argument. I disagree with the hail mary point mainly because I don't agree that it was an undisciplined play, but I recognize that wasn't the main thrust of his point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
G
griffin
Administrator
Members online
griffin
Dukefan12
Latest posts
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
10 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Krabs
15 minutes ago
Draft Talk
M
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: mradtke66
30 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Sanguine camper
37 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
G
I had This Nightmare
Latest: GleefulGary
42 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers to be More Physical
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top