D
Deleted member 6794
Guest
Leonhard is slow, has had a very serious knee injury that nobody fully recovers from, and many don't make it back from.
Leonhard was bad against the run last season, but quite decent in pass coverage. He had three INTs last year (three more than the entire safeties on the Packers) while allowing a 59.3% completion rate to opposing QBs and a 81.1 passer rating.
Huff on the other side allowed four TD passes on nine targets with a 77.8% completion percentage and a 158.3 passer rating (that´s a perfect rating). He allowed three TD passes on five targets in the season opener in Denver after which he got benched for rookie Matt Elam and later released by the Ravens. He was released during the season by Baltimore and picked up by the Broncos, where he didn´t start a single game, being stuck behind Mike Adams (who was spectacular either) on the depth chart.
Huff might be bad. He has been.
But that still would have been our 2nd best safety last year.
Well, I´ve never played safety in my life, but it´s possible I would have been the second best safety on the Packers last season.