1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

Packers running game

Discussion in 'Green Bay Packers Fan Forum' started by BoydAvery, Aug 25, 2006.

  1. BoydAvery

    BoydAvery Cheesehead

    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    I think TT took a huge risk by resigning Ahman Green and Najeh Davenport. I don't think Green will last too long and Davenport is done.

    If Green goes down and Davenport continues to struggle the Packers running game will be in a bind. Remember when Dorsey Levens went down?
     
  2. Popcynical

    Popcynical Cheesehead

    Messages:
    519
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2005
    Location:
    Southern California
    Remember when Bobby Boucher showed up at halftime and the Mud Dogs won the Bourbon Bowl? Do ya!?
     
  3. BoydAvery

    BoydAvery Cheesehead

    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    and do you remember Clarke Hinkle rushing for 476 yds? Do ya!?
     
  4. Popcynical

    Popcynical Cheesehead

    Messages:
    519
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2005
    Location:
    Southern California
    I'm not that old... but I do remember Ray Finkle not pointing the laces out!

    But seriously... If the offensive line becomes what it's supposed to become, we could stick Al Michaels back there for a 1000 yard season.
     
  5. BoydAvery

    BoydAvery Cheesehead

    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    There should be some questions answered about the OL on Monday night vs the Bengals. Atlanta Falcons aren't much to base final opinions on.
     
  6. thetombradyhater

    thetombradyhater Cheesehead

    Messages:
    989
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 5, 2006
    Location:
    <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=42.957176+-
    how was it a risk? no big money, no long years, if the green poop doesn't perform they won't return as packers.

    *from now on our running game is "green poop"*
     
  7. yooperfan

    yooperfan Cheesehead

    Messages:
    1,900
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Location:
    Michigans Upper Peninsula
    My feeling is that Davenport will not be a Packer on opening day unless he comes back from his latest hang nail and runs for 2 thousand yards on Monday night.
     
  8. BoydAvery

    BoydAvery Cheesehead

    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Because then the Packers will have no running game.
     
  9. thetombradyhater

    thetombradyhater Cheesehead

    Messages:
    989
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 5, 2006
    Location:
    <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=42.957176+-
    thats not a risk just bad judgement there was no risk in signing them
     
  10. JbShell

    JbShell Cheesehead

    Messages:
    796
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Location:
    Pearl City IL
    I do not believe it was a bad risk or bad judgement to sign them. And reserve judgement on the running game and ahman green until you see the guy play
     
  11. Popcynical

    Popcynical Cheesehead

    Messages:
    519
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2005
    Location:
    Southern California
    Yes.. because it would have been much worse if we didn't sign them and just stuck with Gado, Beach, and Herron.
     
  12. JbShell

    JbShell Cheesehead

    Messages:
    796
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Location:
    Pearl City IL
    exactly pop
     
  13. porky88

    porky88 Cheesehead

    Messages:
    3,991
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Location:
    Title Town
    Falcons are stronger up front than the Bengals. The Bengals really struggled against the run a year ago and really don't have that great of a defense. Atlanta probably has a top 10 defense on paper.

    Overall I think what GB did against Atlanta suprised everyone including Packer fans. They need to continue to build off of it.

    Tennessee isn't much of a test either.

    Week 1 against Chicago will be the big test.
     
  14. thetombradyhater

    thetombradyhater Cheesehead

    Messages:
    989
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 5, 2006
    Location:
    <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=42.957176+-
    I didn't mean I though signing Green was a bad decision just that if it was anything it was a bad decision not a risk
     
  15. TomAllen

    TomAllen Cheesehead

    Messages:
    365
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    If that happened, maybe they could sign Levens?
     
  16. bozz_2006

    bozz_2006 Cheesehead

    Messages:
    4,576
    Likes Received:
    283
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Location:
    Grand Forks, ND
    who would you have *tried to* sign instead?
     
  17. thetombradyhater

    thetombradyhater Cheesehead

    Messages:
    989
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 5, 2006
    Location:
    <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=42.957176+-
    yeah thats sort of what i was tryng to say
     
  18. Lare

    Lare Cheesehead

    Messages:
    705
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Location:
    Packwalking, WI
    I fail to see what everyone is talking about for the Packers running game against the Falcons. They had 126 yards rushing for the game, much of which came off of one run by Beach and a reverse by Driver. Take those away and we gained 88 yards rushing. Davenport averaged 2.6 yards per carry and Herron averaged 3.3.

    IMO, the RB position is the biggest question mark on this team going into the season. Lose Green and GB is in a world of hurt.

    As to who else we could have gotten, I didn't see much in FA that I think would have made much of an immediate impact, but there were definitly some good young RBs available in the draft. Maybe we could have gotten one instead of taking our 2nd string lineman in the 2nd (Colledge) or our soon to be released WR/KR in the 4th (Rodgers).
     
  19. porky88

    porky88 Cheesehead

    Messages:
    3,991
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Location:
    Title Town
    Brian Caulhon was taking a pick before us and that still makes me cringe. Damn Lions!!!

    Anyways I thought Jamal Lewis would've been a nice pickup in free agency. He's only 27 and could probably run the scheme well. Mike Anderson was a 1,000 yard back in Denver in the exact same scheme. Baltimore was fast to sign both of them though.

    I really like Michael Bush from Louisville. Pending where Green Bay picks in next years draft, we might want to take a look at him. Big physical guy but has speed as well. All around solid back and projects to be a top 15 pick in the Draft.
     
  20. cyoung

    cyoung Cheesehead

    Messages:
    1,276
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Location:
    Iowa
    I think Ahman Green will stay solid for this season and the next, man why are you people always so negative, and Najeh Davenport wasgood when Green went down last season (until he eventually went down) and then theres always Samkon and we know he is solid and strong.
     
  21. Anubis

    Anubis Cheesehead

    Messages:
    767
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2005
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    If Green stays healthy, he will have a good year. He was a Pro-Bowler in 2004 and was playing behind a crap o-line with a nagging injury in 2005. Davenport and Gado will take up the slack if Green gets injured. I really don't know who some people on here expected TT to sign who would have been an immediate improvement over the three listed above.

    And before you say it, Reggie Bush wasn't an option. :p

    GO PACK!!!

    Robert C. Hedley
     
  22. cyoung

    cyoung Cheesehead

    Messages:
    1,276
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Location:
    Iowa
    finally for once it doesn't contain, somthing on Greens injury lets talk about how good he is going to do and not about how bad his injuries MIGHT be
     
  23. BoydAvery

    BoydAvery Cheesehead

    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    O.J. Simpson
     
  24. cyoung

    cyoung Cheesehead

    Messages:
    1,276
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Location:
    Iowa
    Reggie Bush is a little overrated, IMO. I can understand that he is fast and a good runningback but people (once again IMO) are already putting him into the hall of fame because if the saints do good people are going to say its because of Reggie (even if he doesn't play the majority of the season) what ever happened do Deuce McCallister? I like him.
     
  25. pack_in_black

    pack_in_black Cheesehead

    Messages:
    1,876
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Location:
    Colorado Springs
    deuce will surprise some peeps this year. he should stay healthy (less carries) and he is still the Saints #1 RB. On the topic of our running game, it appears fragile to me at this point. Not to say Ahman wont make a good comeback, but our 1st, 2nd, and 3rd string backs are coming off of injuries, we have a young, undertalented o-line, and Hendersons out til at least week one. Things could hold up, but if they don't......well, just remember: no team wins in today's NFL without a consistent running game.
     

Share This Page

-->