Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1059980" data-attributes="member: 10086">What’s crazy is it really isn’t even that deep a WR class, I’d label it more average. Plus as you mentioned it’s not top heavy. Currently we see just 1 consensus top 20 selection and only 4 Day1 projections. There are just 9 consensus Wideouts  RD4-RD6 and remember RD’s 2-3 are likely already going to be WR scramble IMO.While these are not perfect barometers, they are solid indicators that WR needy teams will slight reach at WR a little bit across earlier rounds. That doesn’t bode well for GB, who imo needs 2 WR’s.I offer that because we have Watson out the bulk of his Contract year and he’s arguably one of our 2 best WR’s. Doubs is top 3-4 and hes in a contract year also. Thats 2 of our best 3-4 WR options and we already lost 1 in real time. We also didn’t draft at WR in 2024, so the pipeline is drying.I’m not suggesting we panic, but if we took a poll today of the top 2 most needed position groups in GB at this moment I’d bet WR would finish #1 or #2, possibly ahead of DT or CB. My suggestion (and it’s merely my opinion) is to find Veteran help to offer some assurances we don’t get caught napping.This draft just might be the time to use #23 at WR if it presents itself.</blockquote>

Total: 958 (members: 4, guests: 954)