Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Releasing Nick Perry
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 824518"><p>This is not Ball. Ball has marching orders unless you think he's actually making personnel decisions. He may be the guy laying out the June 1 option numbers and the like but that's not the overall thrust.</p><p></p><p>If you wind the clock back a few years you'd find a lot of Packer contracts were not backloaded or minimally so. Many of the multi-year deals had a pretty even spread of cap cost over the years. Rodgers last contract is indicative. As the pressure to win mounted, more contracts had cap backloaded.</p><p></p><p>Now we're backloading everything with cap costs nearly doubling from year 1 to year 2 in these contracts.</p><p></p><p>Ball was working contracts when they had a flattish spread; he's working contracts now with heavy backload. He's clearly not the variable. It's not Ball saying, "lets sign these 4 guys" or put an offer in for Bell if that rumor is even true.</p><p></p><p>There is a blueprint in place that says "win now" more than a balance. Whether that was set by Gutekunst or Murphy or both I could not say. Murphy must be approving of it. But the message to Ball is, "this is what we're doing, make it fit" or "this is what we want to do, how can it fit?"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 824518"] This is not Ball. Ball has marching orders unless you think he's actually making personnel decisions. He may be the guy laying out the June 1 option numbers and the like but that's not the overall thrust. If you wind the clock back a few years you'd find a lot of Packer contracts were not backloaded or minimally so. Many of the multi-year deals had a pretty even spread of cap cost over the years. Rodgers last contract is indicative. As the pressure to win mounted, more contracts had cap backloaded. Now we're backloading everything with cap costs nearly doubling from year 1 to year 2 in these contracts. Ball was working contracts when they had a flattish spread; he's working contracts now with heavy backload. He's clearly not the variable. It's not Ball saying, "lets sign these 4 guys" or put an offer in for Bell if that rumor is even true. There is a blueprint in place that says "win now" more than a balance. Whether that was set by Gutekunst or Murphy or both I could not say. Murphy must be approving of it. But the message to Ball is, "this is what we're doing, make it fit" or "this is what we want to do, how can it fit?" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 10:29 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 9:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
F
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Firethorn1001
Today at 8:49 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 7:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:52 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Releasing Nick Perry
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top