Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1060658" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>I do think to some extent it's using the NFL's same language and/or precedent against them, too. The league loves to cite "player safety" as a driving factor in all sorts of rule changes (and that *is* often a future justification - wherein someone *could* get injured - rather than pointing to a definitive existing increase in injuries in a given situation) and in the same way the league has outlawed "leverage" situations on defense under the guise of "player safety". You're probably right that it's more or less just an add-on argument and not really the "heart" of it but at the same time I feel like the league has kind of invited these arguments with their inconsistent approach/application of rules</p></blockquote><p></p>

No members online now.

Total: 359 (members: 1, guests: 358)