Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1095419" data-attributes="member: 10086">Things like age or positional fit over pure talent would be great questions to ask a seasoned GM. I’ve often wondered how relevant 1 or 2 years can be? Seems trivial to me but I’m not a GM of a NFL franchise.If I were? My thoughts on age would align more with your argument [USER=9942]@gopkrs[/USER]. In a “Win Now” environment I’d prefer some immediate maturity over future benefits we might not see for 4-7 years. I’ll take 1-2 years of sooner “peak” performance over 2 years of potential longevity if you will.I guess I’m saying in a positional context that if I need a seasoned player at NT today for us specifically in Green Bay? Age is not as much a hindrance unless it’s a Top 10 or Top 20 type prospect.If I’m in a rebuild of sorts or we are Draft picking #13 overall again, then an Age argument turns into a significant advantage or disadvantage.  I suppose I’m not even least bit concerned RD6-7 etc so maybe some emphasis the earlier we pick. Both “age” arguments can be valid though. I’m never dismissing it if two products are otherwise exactly equal.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 485 (members: 0, guests: 485)