Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers' offense remains biggest unknown
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Packnic" data-source="post: 149543" data-attributes="member: 523"><p>as far as proven backfield... its absolutely not a neccessity. Denver has been a rushing leader with the likes of Ruben Droughns, Mike Anderson, and Tatum Bell. Really no back to play in Denver since the ZBS has been star quality or a "proven" back until they left Denver. and these guys go elsewhere and get huge contracts but cant deliver due to the inflated numbers they get in the ZBS. Lineman are much more important than running backs in this scheme.</p><p></p><p>If you look at Atlanta they have Warrick Dunn and Vick and run the ZBS, they get big numbers but its eventually the downfall of them season after season... I think we are in better shape than the Falcons already and they have not one but 2 "proven runners" in their backfield. because when teams start stackin the box, they cant cope. We proved last year we can move the ball in the air alone so if you add a potent rush attack to the passing attack... we might very well be in good shape.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Packnic, post: 149543, member: 523"] as far as proven backfield... its absolutely not a neccessity. Denver has been a rushing leader with the likes of Ruben Droughns, Mike Anderson, and Tatum Bell. Really no back to play in Denver since the ZBS has been star quality or a "proven" back until they left Denver. and these guys go elsewhere and get huge contracts but cant deliver due to the inflated numbers they get in the ZBS. Lineman are much more important than running backs in this scheme. If you look at Atlanta they have Warrick Dunn and Vick and run the ZBS, they get big numbers but its eventually the downfall of them season after season... I think we are in better shape than the Falcons already and they have not one but 2 "proven runners" in their backfield. because when teams start stackin the box, they cant cope. We proved last year we can move the ball in the air alone so if you add a potent rush attack to the passing attack... we might very well be in good shape. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
milani
GreenBaySlacker
Latest posts
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
1 minute ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
17 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: milani
40 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 10:59 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Wisky newbie
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 9:25 AM
Introduce Yourself
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers' offense remains biggest unknown
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top