Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers must start at step one
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buckeyepackfan" data-source="post: 132206" data-attributes="member: 228"><p>Here are the records of the Teams in the NFC with winning records against teams with overall winning records in 2006.</p><p></p><p>Chicago....2-1</p><p>N.O..........2-1</p><p>Philly........2-2</p><p>Dallas.......1-3</p><p>Seattle.....1-3</p><p></p><p>The Packers went 1-5 against teams with winning records in 2006, which means yes they need to start beating teams with winning records, but it also means that The Packers played a tougher schedule than any of the teams that had a winning record.</p><p></p><p>The Pack had a good chance to beat N.O and Seattle, if either or both would have happened The Packers would have had just as many or more wins over teams with winning records than anyone else in the NFC.</p><p></p><p>The point here is that beating a team with an overall winning record is not an accurate stat, a lot come down to when you play a particular team in the year.</p><p></p><p>Good examples are Minnesota and Carolina, with 4 weeks left in the season, both teams were being touted by the "so-called experts" as the teams most likely to win out and get to the play-offs, well we all know what happened.</p><p></p><p>As I look at it, The Packers ended up being the 7th best team in The NFC, they were the last team eliminated for the play-offs,compared to 2005 a vast improvement.</p><p></p><p>In fact and reality, most of the improvement came in the last 4 games of the season where a young team finally realized and learned how to win close games, not having to rely on Brett to carry them on his back.</p><p></p><p>Whether anyone likes it or not, TT is putting together a team HIS WAY. If you ever read any of my posts from early last year you know that I did not agree with The firing of MS, or a lot of the early moves TT made, but unlike some of you I don't dwell on the past. </p><p></p><p>TT was given a job to do, and is doing it his way, whether or not these moves take us to another Superbowl while Brett is still around, only time will tell, but to say The Packers have shown no improvement in 2006 is a bogus statement.</p><p></p><p>I see this as being the critical year in TT's tenure, he has put together a good young team with enough veteran leaders left to take this team into the play-offs in 2007, with a couple of good FA pickups and another solid draft, I can see this happening.</p><p></p><p>BRETT FAVRE WILL BE BACK IN 2007!!!!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buckeyepackfan, post: 132206, member: 228"] Here are the records of the Teams in the NFC with winning records against teams with overall winning records in 2006. Chicago....2-1 N.O..........2-1 Philly........2-2 Dallas.......1-3 Seattle.....1-3 The Packers went 1-5 against teams with winning records in 2006, which means yes they need to start beating teams with winning records, but it also means that The Packers played a tougher schedule than any of the teams that had a winning record. The Pack had a good chance to beat N.O and Seattle, if either or both would have happened The Packers would have had just as many or more wins over teams with winning records than anyone else in the NFC. The point here is that beating a team with an overall winning record is not an accurate stat, a lot come down to when you play a particular team in the year. Good examples are Minnesota and Carolina, with 4 weeks left in the season, both teams were being touted by the "so-called experts" as the teams most likely to win out and get to the play-offs, well we all know what happened. As I look at it, The Packers ended up being the 7th best team in The NFC, they were the last team eliminated for the play-offs,compared to 2005 a vast improvement. In fact and reality, most of the improvement came in the last 4 games of the season where a young team finally realized and learned how to win close games, not having to rely on Brett to carry them on his back. Whether anyone likes it or not, TT is putting together a team HIS WAY. If you ever read any of my posts from early last year you know that I did not agree with The firing of MS, or a lot of the early moves TT made, but unlike some of you I don't dwell on the past. TT was given a job to do, and is doing it his way, whether or not these moves take us to another Superbowl while Brett is still around, only time will tell, but to say The Packers have shown no improvement in 2006 is a bogus statement. I see this as being the critical year in TT's tenure, he has put together a good young team with enough veteran leaders left to take this team into the play-offs in 2007, with a couple of good FA pickups and another solid draft, I can see this happening. BRETT FAVRE WILL BE BACK IN 2007!!!!! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:12 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 10:57 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 3:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 2:00 PM
Movies and Entertainment
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Magooch
Yesterday at 11:43 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers must start at step one
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
