Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Oannes" data-source="post: 150062" data-attributes="member: 816">Oannes' = Mike Sherman??Gee Warhawk... you're right.   The Bears circumstance had nothing to do with their level of interest and intensity, just like it had nothing to do with ours. That most certainly is BS.  Gee, when did the Bears have the division sewn up?  How about home field?   Saints finished with the 2nd seed at 10-6.   Had the Bears lost the TWO games you're referencing they're STILL the team with homefield advantage.   I would think that proves my point more than it does yours.  The Bears walloped Detroit 34-7 earlier in the year.   The squeak by over a bad Tampa team shows you how little intensity they were bringing at the end of the season.   It really is a wonder how we could beat a fired up team like the Bears that last week.So, what did Chicago play for the last 3 weeks of the season?   Keep calling BS... No one will ever pick up the other end of the line.  No...wait... you're going to get a busy signal because of all the other misguided fans dialing the same number.You don't think the Bears would rather face a Packers team they SHUT OUT  vs. any other possible team that could've made the playoffs?  I'd rather face a team I know I could beat.</blockquote>

Total: 1,445 (members: 4, guests: 1,441)