Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="warhawk" data-source="post: 150058" data-attributes="member: 431">Re: Packers & OannesOannes wrote: Ok I get it now. It's obvious that the Packers would have never had a chance against the mighty Bears had we not been so very fortunate to catch them in that "safe mode" at the end of the season.Now I'm sure your going to tell me that this "safe mode" with the Bears started WEEKS before the season was over as kind of a new philosophy that they were testing out.Because it's obvious the mighty Bears HAD to go into this safe mode PRIOR to week freaking FOURTEEN when they barely escaped another juggernaut, those tough *** BUCCANEERS 34-31 in OT, and week FIFTEEN when they beat the **** out of the LIONS 26-21.Yes it's much clearer to me now that I understand that the Bears took a three week time out from playing football.But at the end of they day, even though you have enlightened me with this information, I am going to stay with my gut which tells me the Bears were beatable on any given Sunday by any given team and we just happened to do that when we did.I don't know where you come up with the Bears being ALL THAT but I recall MANY NFL GUYS talking about how the Bears were NOT really very good and if they didn't fix the GROSSMAN problem they were staring at one and out two years in a row.So maybe you should go roll your little "we were CERTAIN to lose to the Bears" ball somewhere else.For me I call ********.</blockquote>

Total: 715 (members: 4, guests: 711)