Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lare" data-source="post: 155746" data-attributes="member: 114">Sorry Cheesey, but we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one. While the intent of my posts were to get people to wait and base their opinions on the facts of this case, you continue to feel it's necessary to pose hypothetical situations in order to exonerate Barnett, regardless of his guilt/innocence.By making statements such as "Plus you have to ask......if this woman was drunk, how much did it take to "push her to the floor"? I have seen women (AND men) that if you breathed on them too hard they would have fell over. He might have just moved his arm to keep her away, and she fell." I think it's somewhat clear what your feelings are on matters of this nature, even though you purport to base your opinions on "fact".As to my being on a jury, if you were innocent I think you would find that you would do well to have an entire jury such as myself deciding your fate. I would base (and have based) my vote on the facts of the case, not on hypothetical situations or theoretical events.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 780 (members: 0, guests: 780)