Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers in best shape for next three years (ESPN)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 615423"><p>It strikes me that cap increases are beneficial only to the extent guys are locked up in long term deals in advance of the increase. At the same time, the cap carryover, in place beginning in 2012, eliminated the "use it or lose it" provision that created an incentive for early extensions. Teams want a discount in early signings to offset an additional season or seasons of injury risk in exchange for the player getting additional security. On the other hand, it's done in the context of the recent signings of comparable players with agents attempting to get projected future cap increases built into the deal as well.</p><p></p><p>Since the other 31 teams enjoy the same benefits of cap increases as the Packers, the result is wage inflation. The cap has increased about 15% in the last 2 years and nearly 70% in the last decade and it has not made getting economical extensions or the signing of free agents any easier.</p><p></p><p>For example, if the cap now is where it was 2 years ago, the Packers and Cobb would have been haggling in the $7 - $8 mil range instead of $8 - $10 mil range.</p><p></p><p>There's no free cap lunch.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 615423"] It strikes me that cap increases are beneficial only to the extent guys are locked up in long term deals in advance of the increase. At the same time, the cap carryover, in place beginning in 2012, eliminated the "use it or lose it" provision that created an incentive for early extensions. Teams want a discount in early signings to offset an additional season or seasons of injury risk in exchange for the player getting additional security. On the other hand, it's done in the context of the recent signings of comparable players with agents attempting to get projected future cap increases built into the deal as well. Since the other 31 teams enjoy the same benefits of cap increases as the Packers, the result is wage inflation. The cap has increased about 15% in the last 2 years and nearly 70% in the last decade and it has not made getting economical extensions or the signing of free agents any easier. For example, if the cap now is where it was 2 years ago, the Packers and Cobb would have been haggling in the $7 - $8 mil range instead of $8 - $10 mil range. There's no free cap lunch. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Isaiah Simmons is COMING
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 4:28 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
UDFA Signings 2025
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:20 AM
Draft Talk
Pick 198 Warren Brinson DT Georgia
Latest: Sanguine camper
Yesterday at 7:49 PM
Draft Talk
Pick 87 Savion Williams WR TCU
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 6:43 PM
Draft Talk
H
Early 53 Man Roster Projection
Latest: Heyjoe4
Yesterday at 2:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers in best shape for next three years (ESPN)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top