Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1091326" data-attributes="member: 17987">I'm back and forth on Harris.Love him from his time here and there is a lot to be excited about. But at the same time, it seems like his defenses (or position groups) have largely been feast or famine? I remember looking at this ahead of our matchups with the Bears. They had a ton of picks - he basically got career best years out of his DBs - but also were pretty awful in coverage. When they weren't getting picks the Bears secondary was one of the worst in the league for pass coverage. So I don't know. Would our guys who are already somewhat better "ballhawks" than "coverage" players lean into that strength and come up with more takeaways... or would those guys who are not the best coverage players to begin with get even more exposed in coverage? Hard for me to say. Feels like a high risk high reward option I guess. I wouldn't be opposed to the hire in general but I do carry some worry</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,264 (members: 1, guests: 1,263)