Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1040133" data-attributes="member: 10086">Felt like we just we just didn’t get much pressure on the QB. Although that might have been estimated. Might not want Hurts running wild either. Seemed like a game of contain but our newer Secondary gave up some intermediate throws with several blown coverages. At least 3-4 times Receivers were wide open underneath in crossers etc.Either Nixon or Alexander INT drops one would’ve changed the course or outcome of this game. Playing aggressive works both ways. It gives up some plays but once they begin to capitalize on Takeaways it changes the whole context. Nixon takes that to the house (pick 6) and it’s 65% a GB Win imo. It didn’t go our way but that’s the sacrifice of playing against the big play (Barry). Either die by slow bleeding or live trying to be the aggressor. I’ll take the latter I’d prefer going down by my mistakes over hoping for theirsI think as we face teams that don’t have a top 5 OL or Top 5 Rushing QB? we will see more low hanging fruit. Loved what I saw from Edgerrin he immediately makes an impact. He looks like a Day 1 LB out of the gate.i think we’ll be fine as we get some continuity. Can’t expect a new scheme to gel week 1 either.I also think our O stumbled a bit just being rusty. I’ve never seen #10 throw into the dirt like that.</blockquote>

Total: 1,092 (members: 2, guests: 1,090)