Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers get their Safety in Manuel?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="all about da packers" data-source="post: 51253" data-attributes="member: 227"><p>Damn, I didn't mean this thread as a way to basically start a fight between different posters. What I meant to do by this thread was simple, let others know this could be a likly FA signing, and to debate on the fact that why would TT make this move?</p><p></p><p>My criticism here is that while he is obviously a better tackler that Roman, the fact that he was beat out by Roman in Cincinati raises a concern for me. And while he might be able to lay a licking, I would like to see our Safties get some turnovers too. And the fact that he has zero in his career so far would suggest he has poor pass skills. I know the fact that he could have had some chances, but lets face it, you would at least expect him to get one. </p><p></p><p>I am not going to outright say TT sucks. But I will criticize this pick because that is my right as the fan of this team. ON PAPER this looks like a very questionable move. I was just pointing out that I believe the price tag we got him for (of course if it is correct, could very well be wrong), this wasn't the greatest of deals. Could I be wrong, HELL YES! Would I like to be wrong? Well if me being wrong is going to benefit the Packers, then I wish I am wrong, and I WILL step up and say I made a mistake in questioning this move. </p><p></p><p>I also just wanted to bring up the fact that since he is a sure tackler, maybe we would switch him to LB. This is the offseason, and these rumors are something I will post for the simple fact that talking about only facts will make this forum less interesting. As fans, we can speculate, criticize, and of course dream of what can be. That was my only reason to start this thread, not to make fun of TT, or MS, or have members fight it out. I just wanted to talk about a possible direction that the Packers could take. And if I am wrong in doing so, then I will appologize if I have to.</p><p></p><p>Edit: Thanks for the comments from Hawks fans. Well after reading those, perhaps his skills aren't as bad as first thought. Interesting, someone considered him to be one of the big reasons the lost the SB. Hmm, that would lead you to believe he is solid, to say the least.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="all about da packers, post: 51253, member: 227"] Damn, I didn't mean this thread as a way to basically start a fight between different posters. What I meant to do by this thread was simple, let others know this could be a likly FA signing, and to debate on the fact that why would TT make this move? My criticism here is that while he is obviously a better tackler that Roman, the fact that he was beat out by Roman in Cincinati raises a concern for me. And while he might be able to lay a licking, I would like to see our Safties get some turnovers too. And the fact that he has zero in his career so far would suggest he has poor pass skills. I know the fact that he could have had some chances, but lets face it, you would at least expect him to get one. I am not going to outright say TT sucks. But I will criticize this pick because that is my right as the fan of this team. ON PAPER this looks like a very questionable move. I was just pointing out that I believe the price tag we got him for (of course if it is correct, could very well be wrong), this wasn't the greatest of deals. Could I be wrong, HELL YES! Would I like to be wrong? Well if me being wrong is going to benefit the Packers, then I wish I am wrong, and I WILL step up and say I made a mistake in questioning this move. I also just wanted to bring up the fact that since he is a sure tackler, maybe we would switch him to LB. This is the offseason, and these rumors are something I will post for the simple fact that talking about only facts will make this forum less interesting. As fans, we can speculate, criticize, and of course dream of what can be. That was my only reason to start this thread, not to make fun of TT, or MS, or have members fight it out. I just wanted to talk about a possible direction that the Packers could take. And if I am wrong in doing so, then I will appologize if I have to. Edit: Thanks for the comments from Hawks fans. Well after reading those, perhaps his skills aren't as bad as first thought. Interesting, someone considered him to be one of the big reasons the lost the SB. Hmm, that would lead you to believe he is solid, to say the least. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:12 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 10:57 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 3:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 2:00 PM
Movies and Entertainment
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Magooch
Yesterday at 11:43 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers get their Safety in Manuel?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
