Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers exercise fifth-year option on Clark
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 877715"><p>See, you didn't even present % of pressures from inside or whatnot to come to that conclusion though I would be curious to know Clark's % of snaps from 5-tech tangling with OTs and what he did with them if PFF in fact has that performance data by position. Just the data, not the grade! <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-shortname=";)" /> Pretty low snap count I'd surmise.</p><p></p><p>I'd assume your proposition that Clark is the 4th. best player among those guys is adjusting for his second contract age. I mean he's not Fletcher Cox until Cox hits the age wall which has not happened yet. I'll await Clark's 5-tech snap data to see how much apples to oranges we're talking about here. </p><p></p><p>The question isn't whether the 4th. best interior DL is worth that money. It's whether Kenny Clark playing predominantly or exclusively 0-3 tech is worth that money given the other ways it might be spent. I'm sure this is under consideration if the demand is that high or they would have already paid the man by now. I wouldn't pay him $16 mil per year taken in isolation. At this stage the best argument is, "who else ya got?". Well, that "who else" is Kenny Clark playing on the 5th. year option and then next year's chips are left to fall where they may.</p><p></p><p>Gutekust could have done something about that "who else" in the draft. Maybe he did with That Smith-Smith-Gary nickel/dime projection. I wouldn't have done what Gutekunst did in those first three rounds either, WR or not, so we'll just have to wait and see where his max pain point with Clark happens to sit.</p><p></p><p>It's worth noting he didn't re-sign Bulaga. He didn't sign Austin Hooper, a player of purported interest. In the past his tender for Kyle Fuller was too low to land him; he was purported to have keen interest in Allen Robinson and at least some interest in Sammy Watkins and he did not sign those guys either. He has a max $ amounts in mind, and where he placed them with those guys was not all that high given what they signed for with the exception of Watkins. We might see what that max is with Clark, or not.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 877715"] See, you didn't even present % of pressures from inside or whatnot to come to that conclusion though I would be curious to know Clark's % of snaps from 5-tech tangling with OTs and what he did with them if PFF in fact has that performance data by position. Just the data, not the grade! ;) Pretty low snap count I'd surmise. I'd assume your proposition that Clark is the 4th. best player among those guys is adjusting for his second contract age. I mean he's not Fletcher Cox until Cox hits the age wall which has not happened yet. I'll await Clark's 5-tech snap data to see how much apples to oranges we're talking about here. The question isn't whether the 4th. best interior DL is worth that money. It's whether Kenny Clark playing predominantly or exclusively 0-3 tech is worth that money given the other ways it might be spent. I'm sure this is under consideration if the demand is that high or they would have already paid the man by now. I wouldn't pay him $16 mil per year taken in isolation. At this stage the best argument is, "who else ya got?". Well, that "who else" is Kenny Clark playing on the 5th. year option and then next year's chips are left to fall where they may. Gutekust could have done something about that "who else" in the draft. Maybe he did with That Smith-Smith-Gary nickel/dime projection. I wouldn't have done what Gutekunst did in those first three rounds either, WR or not, so we'll just have to wait and see where his max pain point with Clark happens to sit. It's worth noting he didn't re-sign Bulaga. He didn't sign Austin Hooper, a player of purported interest. In the past his tender for Kyle Fuller was too low to land him; he was purported to have keen interest in Allen Robinson and at least some interest in Sammy Watkins and he did not sign those guys either. He has a max $ amounts in mind, and where he placed them with those guys was not all that high given what they signed for with the exception of Watkins. We might see what that max is with Clark, or not. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
kf323
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
40 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 8:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 6:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:47 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
M
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: mradtke66
Today at 6:08 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers exercise fifth-year option on Clark
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
