1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
  2. Big Announcement Coming for 2015 Football Season!!

    Be on the look out for a big Packer Forum announcement when the schedule is released. Full details coming soon... Update: Announcement to be released on MONDAY!

Packers cut Chatman

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by Chamuko, Mar 3, 2006.

  1. Chamuko

    Chamuko Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,067
    Ratings:
    +0
    check the link:

    Web Page Name

    I really liked him, he gave all on every play, he never fumbled any punt, he even get some very good receptions,,,, but MM likes big targets and it is his call. What about big hearted targets? If he likes them he will need to cut big sized, big mouth, small heart Fergy too. Chatman had much better numbers tha Fergy´s

    Well if he cuts useless Fergy, maybe better if he trades him for a six pack of Corona Beer I will be satisfied.

    I remember once that Bruce refering to Chatman used this Mark Twain quote "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog".

    Well MM now you have to find big targets, with bigger hearts, and bigger fights inside !!!!!! You are setting your standards my friend !!!
     
  2. GakkofNorway

    GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,249
    Ratings:
    +0
    WTF?

    Why did we cut Chatman?

    Why did we keep Ferguson?

    1. Chatman didn't drop a single pass
    2. He was a decent returner
    3. Chatman was one of our best receivers last season :(

    This is not good news :(

    I really liked Chatman, and I hate fergy.
     
  3. JbShell

    JbShell Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    796
    Ratings:
    +0
    If he likes big physical guys scratch draft williams out of Wisconsin. MM must be pretty dunce you do need someone on the return teams
     
  4. Chamuko

    Chamuko Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,067
    Ratings:
    +0
    See,,,,, good to hear I not the only one !!!
     
  5. GakkofNorway

    GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,249
    Ratings:
    +0
    We need a small guy for the returner job, I think they might get Brandon Williams for that.

    Hank Baskett seems to be pretty interesting if he falls a little in the draft, maybe to the 3rd round if we're lucky, anyone think he can fall that far?
     
  6. JbShell

    JbShell Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    796
    Ratings:
    +0
    AND FOR THE LOVE OF GOD why would you not cut Fergy first he has shown absolutely nothing to the Packers. No skill no desire.
     
  7. GakkofNorway

    GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,249
    Ratings:
    +0
    I agree, but I think they want to trade Fergy, he might still have some value!
     
  8. JbShell

    JbShell Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    796
    Ratings:
    +0
    Yeah maybe in a strict ball control offense that does not require a guy to fight for the ball
     
  9. GakkofNorway

    GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,249
    Ratings:
    +0
    hehehe, I think we will trade him to da stinkin' bears for some draft picks :D:D
     
  10. musccy

    musccy Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    1,854
    Ratings:
    +1
    fergy...value?!? He's injury prone, soft, and hasn't done anything in the last 2 years

    Chatman isn't the ultimate answer, but as others have said, I hate seeing someone like him cut loose...you can't tell me he can't be the #4 wr for the pack next year!
     
  11. JbShell

    JbShell Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    796
    Ratings:
    +0
    I honestly dont think so

    1 you never trade to a divisional opponent
    2 why would they want him they see him twice every year and he sucks more likely the bears would pick up chatman
     
  12. GakkofNorway

    GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,249
    Ratings:
    +0
    1. It would be a good draft, we get picks they get a sucky receiver
    2. They are stupid
     
  13. Greg C.

    Greg C. Cheesehead

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    2,856
    Ratings:
    +0
    Disappointing. Hopefully it is just some kind of salary cap move. I wouldn't mind seeing somebody beat Chatman out in training camp for that punt returner/#4 receiver job, but I think he at least deserves to battle for the job.
     
  14. GakkofNorway

    GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,249
    Ratings:
    +0
    well he isn't even going to be in the battle it seems..
     
  15. tkpckfan

    tkpckfan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2005
    Messages:
    326
    Ratings:
    +0
    i really believe we did this because we will pick up a reciever in free agency
     
  16. GakkofNorway

    GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,249
    Ratings:
    +0
    It's time to start discussing who we will pick up,
    might I guess, Antwaan Randle El?
     
  17. yooperfan

    yooperfan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,900
    Ratings:
    +0
    I would love to see him in the green and gold!
     
  18. GakkofNorway

    GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,249
    Ratings:
    +0
    He's a return guy too!

    btw... I just became a platinum supporter :D
     
  19. tkpckfan

    tkpckfan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2005
    Messages:
    326
    Ratings:
    +0
    well we do need a returner now so he could be a good option. or possibly brandon lloyd. he was on the 49ers with mcarthy and hes pretty good
     
  20. GakkofNorway

    GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,249
    Ratings:
    +0
    I really don't see why we cut Chatman if we're going to sign Lloyd. He's not that much bigger than Chatman.
     
  21. paxvogel

    paxvogel Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2005
    Messages:
    501
    Ratings:
    +0
    We will probably sign Gardner. I don't blame Ferguson for being injury prone and what I read he did work hard. Just a really bad pick when we could have had Chambers and I said that at the time. But I really don't understand cutting Chatman. He will get picked up.
     
  22. GakkofNorway

    GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,249
    Ratings:
    +0
    I hope the Vikings don't pick him up, he's a packers guy :(
     
  23. Buckeyepackfan

    Buckeyepackfan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    804
    Ratings:
    +0
    Another one of Mike Sherman's guys gone.
    This is TT's team now, nobody is safe.
    Goodluck to Antonio, one muffed punt in 3 years, 0 fumbles,
    and a heck of a 4th reciever, he will land on his feet somewnere.
     
  24. GakkofNorway

    GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,249
    Ratings:
    +0
    He will be remembered as one of the bright spots in a dark season

    [​IMG]
     
  25. JbShell

    JbShell Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    796
    Ratings:
    +0
    Still would have been better served to pick up the option and then shop him for a 4th round pick or something like it. Pretty stupid to just let him go
     

Share This Page