1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

Packers contact Brunell

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by bigfog, Mar 6, 2008.

  1. bigfog

    bigfog Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2008
    Messages:
    242
    Ratings:
    +0
    From Railbird.

    Interesting, Brunell could finish where he started in the NFL. Kinda neat actually.

     
  2. tromadz

    tromadz Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,000
    Ratings:
    +3
    Very good idea.

    1. A-rod needs a backup.
    2. Brunell could actually be somewhat serviceable if god forbid A-Rod goes down.
     
  3. Heatherthepackgirl

    Heatherthepackgirl Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    2,274
    Ratings:
    +0
    Smart move for sure, we do need a veteran QB backing Rodgers.
     
  4. PackOne

    PackOne Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    Messages:
    2,013
    Ratings:
    +4
  5. Pack93z

    Pack93z You retired too? .... Not me. I'm in my prime

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2005
    Messages:
    4,855
    Ratings:
    +22
    I said it early this week, it will be a QB that currently is smarter than talented, much of Brunell's game has passed him, but very intelligent QB that could help Aaron from the sidelines..
     
  6. cheesey

    cheesey Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1,000
    Ratings:
    +3
    Old quarterbacks never die........they just keep "passing away!" :lol:
     
  7. Buckeyepackfan

    Buckeyepackfan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    804
    Ratings:
    +0
    Another "Cheesey Classic", Brunell would be a good move, but I still think nall can do the job as back-up.
     
  8. nathaniel

    nathaniel Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Messages:
    905
    Ratings:
    +0
    As long as Brunell doesn't think he's coming in as the starting QB.
     
  9. DarkaneRules

    DarkaneRules Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2007
    Messages:
    536
    Ratings:
    +0
    I like this idea. I really do.
     
  10. Bobby Roberts

    Bobby Roberts Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    770
    Ratings:
    +0
    The article clearly states a quote from his agent that he's looking for a backup role and not to be the starter.

    I don't mind the idea, but I'd like to see Nall given a chance to beat Brunell out as the backup. I'd also like to see a couple of young guys given a chance to fight it out for the #3 QB spot.
     
  11. Obi1

    Obi1 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    1,110
    Ratings:
    +0
    Wait, wait, hold the phone, stop the presses, call the doctor, alert the town crier!

    Cheesey took that one from me! ANOTHER one that he owes me!
     
  12. porky88

    porky88 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    3,991
    Ratings:
    +0
    That would be an ideal fit for the Packers and Rodgers.
     
  13. TheKanataThrilla

    TheKanataThrilla Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2007
    Messages:
    320
    Ratings:
    +0
    Makes a lot of sense. If we hit the playoffs, I like the fact that Brunell is around should an injury occur. Good leader and a smart QB. Still think Warner would be the best person for the role, but he may still have starter ambitions which would not make for a good lockeroom situation.
     
  14. millertime

    millertime Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Messages:
    841
    Ratings:
    +0
    I called it,
    Toot. Toot.
     

Share This Page