Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers better than 5 years ago
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JBlood" data-source="post: 282933" data-attributes="member: 16"><p><strong>Mike Vandermause column: Green Bay Packers better now than 5 years ago</strong></p><p></p><p> <a href="mailto:mvandermause@greenbaypressgazette.com">By Mike Vandermause</a> • May 8, 2010 </p><p> </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><a href="http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:void%28null%29;" target="_blank"><em>.us</em> </a></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> <a href="http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:void%28null%29;" target="_blank"> <em>Facebook</em> </a></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> Are the <a href="http://topics.greenbaypressgazette.com/Green+Bay+Packers/" target="_blank">Green Bay Packers</a> better off now than five years ago when Ted Thompson was hired as general manager?</li> </ul> </li> </ul><p></p><p> The record says yes. Thompson inherited a 10-6 team coming off a first-round playoff loss when he replaced Mike Sherman[ATTACH=full]8627[/ATTACH] as GM in January 2005. Five years later, Thompson has an 11-5 team also coming off a first-round playoff defeat.</p><p></p><p>A one-game improvement in the standings doesn’t seem like much, but a comparison of the Packers’ roster in 2005 and today indicates, on paper at least, an improved team with greater potential.</p><p></p><p>In a subjective assessment, the Packers have improved at 11 of the 22 starting positions, gotten worse at seven spots and stayed the same at four others. At three positions — tight end, nose tackle and one cornerback spot — the Packers are significantly better. They also have upgraded their depth.</p><p></p><p>Here is an analysis of how the Packers compare (better, worse, same) to five years ago. Players during the 2004 season — Sherman’s last as GM — were matched up against the current roster.</p><p><strong>Starting offense</strong></p><p></p><p> <strong>Quarterback: </strong><a href="http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20100508/PKR07/100508022/1058/PKR01/Vandermause--Packers-better-now-than--05#" target="_blank">Brett Favre</a> lovers will squawk, but the numbers suggest Aaron Rodgers (30 touchdowns, 7 interceptions, 103.2 rating, 4,434 yards) is an upgrade over a 35-year-old Favre during the 2004 season (30 TDs, 17 INTs, 92.4 rating, 4,088 yards). BETTER</p><p></p><p><strong>Running back: </strong><a href="http://topics.greenbaypressgazette.com/Ahman+Green/" target="_blank">Ahman Green</a> was in his prime and coming off a fifth consecutive 1,000-yard season (1,163 yards, 4.5 average). Ryan Grant’s rushing numbers are similar (1,253, 4.4), but Green was a bigger pass-catching threat (40 receptions compared to Grant’s 25). WORSE</p><p></p><p><strong>Fullback: </strong>There’s not much difference between an aging William Henderson and the John Kuhn-Korey Hall combo at the least consequential starting position. SAME</p><p></p><p><strong>No. 1 receiver: </strong>Javon Walker[ATTACH=full]8628[/ATTACH] had one breakout season but flamed out quickly. Consistency gives Greg Jennings the edge. BETTER</p><p></p><p><strong>No. 2 receiver: </strong>It’s only natural that a 29-year-old Donald Driver (84 catches, 1,208 yards) had a little more spring in his step than he does now (70, 1,061), but there isn’t a huge gap. WORSE</p><p></p><p><strong>Tight end: </strong>The difference between Jermichael Finley (55 catches, 676 yards) and Bubba Franks[ATTACH=full]8629[/ATTACH] (34, 361) is like night and day. MUCH BETTER</p><p></p><p><strong>Left tackle: </strong>Until rookie first-round draft pick Bryan Bulaga[ATTACH=full]8630[/ATTACH] proves otherwise, Chad Clifton remains the starter. But he is older, slower and more injury prone. WORSE</p><p></p><p><strong>Left guard: </strong>Daryn Colledge hasn’t come close to filling Mike Wahle’s shoes. If Wahle was a size 12, Colledge wears a size 9. WORSE</p><p></p><p><strong>Center: </strong>I’ll take my chances with Scott Wells over Grey Ruegamer[ATTACH=full]8631[/ATTACH]. BETTER</p><p></p><p><strong>Right guard: </strong>Thompson has been chastised for letting Marco Rivera go in 2005, but it was the right move. I favor a youthful Josh Sitton over a long-in-the-tooth Rivera. BETTER</p><p></p><p><strong>Right tackle: </strong>As with Clifton, it’s admirable that Mark Tauscher is still around, but he’s no longer in his prime. WORSE</p><p><strong>Starting defense</strong></p><p></p><p> <strong>Primary pass rusher: </strong>This designation will help in comparing the current 3-4 defense to the Packers’ former 4-3 scheme. Right defensive end Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila was a sack machine in his prime but one-dimensional, and thus right outside linebacker Clay Matthews receives the nod. BETTER</p><p></p><p><strong>Defensive end: </strong>Johnny Jolly is versatile and can be a force but has stiff competition against Aaron Kampman entering his best years. WORSE</p><p></p><p><strong>Nose tackle: </strong>Grady Jackson doesn’t reside in the same ZIP code as Ryan Pickett and B.J. Raji. MUCH BETTER</p><p></p><p><strong>Defensive line: </strong>I will take Cullen Jenkins over Cletidus Hunt any day of the week and twice on Sundays. But then, I would take just about anyone over the underachieving Hunt. BETTER</p><p></p><p><strong>Middle linebacker: </strong>Nick Barnett still is the starter after all these years, and despite a potentially devastating knee injury in 2008, can still bring it. SAME</p><p></p><p><strong>Linebacker: </strong>Brad Jones has only half a season of starting experience under his belt, but he looks good compared to Hannibal Navies. BETTER</p><p></p><p><strong>Linebacker: </strong>A.J. Hawk gets criticized for not making enough plays, but his stock soars when matched up against Na’il Diggs. BETTER</p><p></p><p><strong>Cornerback: </strong>Five years and one serious knee injury have taken their toll on Al Harris. He can’t possibly be as good, can he? WORSE</p><p></p><p><strong>Cornerback: </strong>Ahmad Carroll vs. Charles Woodson? That’s like comparing my dandelion-infested back yard to Lambeau Field. MUCH BETTER</p><p></p><p><strong>Free safety: </strong>Take your pick between two Pro Bowl-caliber players in Darren Sharper and Nick Collins. SAME</p><p></p><p><strong>Strong safety: </strong>Atari Bigby has struggled the past two seasons, but he’s a cut above Mark Roman. BETTER</p><p><strong>Backup depth</strong></p><p></p><p> <strong>Defense: </strong>Five years ago, bench players included R-Kal Truluck on the line, Paris Lenon and Steve Josue at linebacker, and Michael Hawthorne, Joey Thomas, Jason Horton, Chris Johnson and Bhawoh Jue in the secondary. Today, Tramon Williams is vastly better than Hawthorne as the No. 3 cornerback, and quality players like Raji and linebackers Brandon Chillar and Desmond Bishop can’t even crack the starting lineup. BETTER</p><p></p><p><strong>Offense: </strong>The 53-man playoff roster in January 2005 included Sean McHugh and Ben Steele at tight end, Robert Ferguson, Antonio Chatman and Andrae Thurman at receiver, and Steve Morley and Brad Bedell on the line. No wonder the Packers went out with barely a whimper in a first-round postseason loss to the Minnesota Vikings at Lambeau. BETTER</p><p><strong>Other areas</strong></p><p></p><p> <strong>Special teams: </strong>Other than kicker Ryan Longwell, the Packers’ special teams were mediocre five years ago, yet Thompson has failed to upgrade those units. SAME</p><p></p><p><strong>Coaching: </strong>Mike McCarthy in four seasons has the same winning percentage (38-26, .594) as Mike Sherman in six seasons (57-39, .594). McCarthy gets the edge because he advanced to the NFC title game, while Sherman never got past the divisional round of the playoffs. BETTER</p><p> <strong>Mike Vandermause is sports editor of the Press-Gazette.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>I'd argue the grades at running back and no. 2 receiver, since Green was nearing the end of his greatness and Driver was the no. 1 receiver 5 years ago, imo. Maybe this will be the year the offensive line jells, and we establish a ball control, time consuming offense in the 4th quarters that will carry us to the 13th Championship this year.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Thompson is a good GM, and a good man.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JBlood, post: 282933, member: 16"] [B]Mike Vandermause column: Green Bay Packers better now than 5 years ago[/B] [EMAIL="mvandermause@greenbaypressgazette.com"]By Mike Vandermause[/EMAIL] • May 8, 2010 [LIST] [*] [LIST] [*][URL="http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:void%28null%29;"][I].us[/I] [/URL] [*] [URL="http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:void%28null%29;"] [I]Facebook[/I] [/URL] [*] Are the [URL="http://topics.greenbaypressgazette.com/Green+Bay+Packers/"]Green Bay Packers[/URL] better off now than five years ago when Ted Thompson was hired as general manager? [/LIST] [/LIST] The record says yes. Thompson inherited a 10-6 team coming off a first-round playoff loss when he replaced Mike Sherman[ATTACH=full]8627[/ATTACH] as GM in January 2005. Five years later, Thompson has an 11-5 team also coming off a first-round playoff defeat. A one-game improvement in the standings doesn’t seem like much, but a comparison of the Packers’ roster in 2005 and today indicates, on paper at least, an improved team with greater potential. In a subjective assessment, the Packers have improved at 11 of the 22 starting positions, gotten worse at seven spots and stayed the same at four others. At three positions — tight end, nose tackle and one cornerback spot — the Packers are significantly better. They also have upgraded their depth. Here is an analysis of how the Packers compare (better, worse, same) to five years ago. Players during the 2004 season — Sherman’s last as GM — were matched up against the current roster. [B]Starting offense[/B] [B]Quarterback: [/B][URL="http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20100508/PKR07/100508022/1058/PKR01/Vandermause--Packers-better-now-than--05#"]Brett Favre[/URL] lovers will squawk, but the numbers suggest Aaron Rodgers (30 touchdowns, 7 interceptions, 103.2 rating, 4,434 yards) is an upgrade over a 35-year-old Favre during the 2004 season (30 TDs, 17 INTs, 92.4 rating, 4,088 yards). BETTER [B]Running back: [/B][URL="http://topics.greenbaypressgazette.com/Ahman+Green/"]Ahman Green[/URL] was in his prime and coming off a fifth consecutive 1,000-yard season (1,163 yards, 4.5 average). Ryan Grant’s rushing numbers are similar (1,253, 4.4), but Green was a bigger pass-catching threat (40 receptions compared to Grant’s 25). WORSE [B]Fullback: [/B]There’s not much difference between an aging William Henderson and the John Kuhn-Korey Hall combo at the least consequential starting position. SAME [B]No. 1 receiver: [/B]Javon Walker[ATTACH=full]8628[/ATTACH] had one breakout season but flamed out quickly. Consistency gives Greg Jennings the edge. BETTER [B]No. 2 receiver: [/B]It’s only natural that a 29-year-old Donald Driver (84 catches, 1,208 yards) had a little more spring in his step than he does now (70, 1,061), but there isn’t a huge gap. WORSE [B]Tight end: [/B]The difference between Jermichael Finley (55 catches, 676 yards) and Bubba Franks[ATTACH=full]8629[/ATTACH] (34, 361) is like night and day. MUCH BETTER [B]Left tackle: [/B]Until rookie first-round draft pick Bryan Bulaga[ATTACH=full]8630[/ATTACH] proves otherwise, Chad Clifton remains the starter. But he is older, slower and more injury prone. WORSE [B]Left guard: [/B]Daryn Colledge hasn’t come close to filling Mike Wahle’s shoes. If Wahle was a size 12, Colledge wears a size 9. WORSE [B]Center: [/B]I’ll take my chances with Scott Wells over Grey Ruegamer[ATTACH=full]8631[/ATTACH]. BETTER [B]Right guard: [/B]Thompson has been chastised for letting Marco Rivera go in 2005, but it was the right move. I favor a youthful Josh Sitton over a long-in-the-tooth Rivera. BETTER [B]Right tackle: [/B]As with Clifton, it’s admirable that Mark Tauscher is still around, but he’s no longer in his prime. WORSE [B]Starting defense[/B] [B]Primary pass rusher: [/B]This designation will help in comparing the current 3-4 defense to the Packers’ former 4-3 scheme. Right defensive end Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila was a sack machine in his prime but one-dimensional, and thus right outside linebacker Clay Matthews receives the nod. BETTER [B]Defensive end: [/B]Johnny Jolly is versatile and can be a force but has stiff competition against Aaron Kampman entering his best years. WORSE [B]Nose tackle: [/B]Grady Jackson doesn’t reside in the same ZIP code as Ryan Pickett and B.J. Raji. MUCH BETTER [B]Defensive line: [/B]I will take Cullen Jenkins over Cletidus Hunt any day of the week and twice on Sundays. But then, I would take just about anyone over the underachieving Hunt. BETTER [B]Middle linebacker: [/B]Nick Barnett still is the starter after all these years, and despite a potentially devastating knee injury in 2008, can still bring it. SAME [B]Linebacker: [/B]Brad Jones has only half a season of starting experience under his belt, but he looks good compared to Hannibal Navies. BETTER [B]Linebacker: [/B]A.J. Hawk gets criticized for not making enough plays, but his stock soars when matched up against Na’il Diggs. BETTER [B]Cornerback: [/B]Five years and one serious knee injury have taken their toll on Al Harris. He can’t possibly be as good, can he? WORSE [B]Cornerback: [/B]Ahmad Carroll vs. Charles Woodson? That’s like comparing my dandelion-infested back yard to Lambeau Field. MUCH BETTER [B]Free safety: [/B]Take your pick between two Pro Bowl-caliber players in Darren Sharper and Nick Collins. SAME [B]Strong safety: [/B]Atari Bigby has struggled the past two seasons, but he’s a cut above Mark Roman. BETTER [B]Backup depth[/B] [B]Defense: [/B]Five years ago, bench players included R-Kal Truluck on the line, Paris Lenon and Steve Josue at linebacker, and Michael Hawthorne, Joey Thomas, Jason Horton, Chris Johnson and Bhawoh Jue in the secondary. Today, Tramon Williams is vastly better than Hawthorne as the No. 3 cornerback, and quality players like Raji and linebackers Brandon Chillar and Desmond Bishop can’t even crack the starting lineup. BETTER [B]Offense: [/B]The 53-man playoff roster in January 2005 included Sean McHugh and Ben Steele at tight end, Robert Ferguson, Antonio Chatman and Andrae Thurman at receiver, and Steve Morley and Brad Bedell on the line. No wonder the Packers went out with barely a whimper in a first-round postseason loss to the Minnesota Vikings at Lambeau. BETTER [B]Other areas[/B] [B]Special teams: [/B]Other than kicker Ryan Longwell, the Packers’ special teams were mediocre five years ago, yet Thompson has failed to upgrade those units. SAME [B]Coaching: [/B]Mike McCarthy in four seasons has the same winning percentage (38-26, .594) as Mike Sherman in six seasons (57-39, .594). McCarthy gets the edge because he advanced to the NFC title game, while Sherman never got past the divisional round of the playoffs. BETTER [B]Mike Vandermause is sports editor of the Press-Gazette. I'd argue the grades at running back and no. 2 receiver, since Green was nearing the end of his greatness and Driver was the no. 1 receiver 5 years ago, imo. Maybe this will be the year the offensive line jells, and we establish a ball control, time consuming offense in the 4th quarters that will carry us to the 13th Championship this year. Thompson is a good GM, and a good man. [/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
milani
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
15 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Cap Projections and changes
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 11:26 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 11:24 PM
Movies and Entertainment
M
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Magooch
Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
2026 Draft Rd 6 #35 K Trey Smack Florida
Latest: mradtke66
Yesterday at 2:31 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers better than 5 years ago
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
