Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers 8-8 this year?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="porky88" data-source="post: 144372" data-attributes="member: 489"><p>Where do I sarcastically denounce the writers creditability? I don't consider John Clayton a Draft Expert when people post who he thinks won and lost at the Draft. I listen though but I don‘t always agree. When someone posts something from Todd McShay about the draft I put more weight into his word because he’s actually a talent evaluator and covers the Draft years round. Pro Football Talk posts rumors and I think most of them are wrong or taken from various newspapers around the country. I don‘t believe in sites made by fans. On the sidelines isn’t exactly posted by an expert either. Those are the only two I will actually go as far and denounce no matter what they say whether I agree with them or not. I want Moss but I don’t believe Favre think he’s coming at all. I think it’s a false report.</p><p></p><p>Who are you trying to fool? This guy agrees with you so he is a true journalists. Where as Peter King who has far more creditability than this guy doesn't agree with you so you post sarcasm to get your points across. Longtime has as much right to put a lot in the article he posted as you do his. I never said I was an expert. I never said I new more than you. Your the one that whines about posting your opinions yet you rarely use the words. When you post you make it out as fact. It's unrealistic for the Packers to go 10-6. Who are you to say it is? I think the Pack will win 9 games tops but I'm not going to bash other people and say their thoughts are unrealistic when a team like the Jets can go from 4-12 to 10-6. If that can happen the Packers can go from 8-8 to 10-6. I agree 100% with cheesy. It could happen. Hope it will but I won't bet either way on it.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: Another thing that is frustrating. You complain that this site is filled with homers. Then why come here if you don't like it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="porky88, post: 144372, member: 489"] Where do I sarcastically denounce the writers creditability? I don't consider John Clayton a Draft Expert when people post who he thinks won and lost at the Draft. I listen though but I don‘t always agree. When someone posts something from Todd McShay about the draft I put more weight into his word because he’s actually a talent evaluator and covers the Draft years round. Pro Football Talk posts rumors and I think most of them are wrong or taken from various newspapers around the country. I don‘t believe in sites made by fans. On the sidelines isn’t exactly posted by an expert either. Those are the only two I will actually go as far and denounce no matter what they say whether I agree with them or not. I want Moss but I don’t believe Favre think he’s coming at all. I think it’s a false report. Who are you trying to fool? This guy agrees with you so he is a true journalists. Where as Peter King who has far more creditability than this guy doesn't agree with you so you post sarcasm to get your points across. Longtime has as much right to put a lot in the article he posted as you do his. I never said I was an expert. I never said I new more than you. Your the one that whines about posting your opinions yet you rarely use the words. When you post you make it out as fact. It's unrealistic for the Packers to go 10-6. Who are you to say it is? I think the Pack will win 9 games tops but I'm not going to bash other people and say their thoughts are unrealistic when a team like the Jets can go from 4-12 to 10-6. If that can happen the Packers can go from 8-8 to 10-6. I agree 100% with cheesy. It could happen. Hope it will but I won't bet either way on it. EDIT: Another thing that is frustrating. You complain that this site is filled with homers. Then why come here if you don't like it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 8:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers 8-8 this year?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
