Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers 8-8 this year?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="porky88" data-source="post: 144368" data-attributes="member: 489"><p>I don't think you can look at the Packers and say this team isn't going to be any better because they didn't bring anyone in. That assessment is ridiculous in my opinion. Now I agree the Packers aren't going to win the Super Bowl and they'll probably win 7 to 9 games but I see no reason why someone can't predict 9-7 and a wild card birth in the NFC which is the JV league of the NFL. Does that make you a homer?</p><p></p><p>The Packers started a bunch of young players. A.J. Hawk, Corey Williams, Cullen Jenkins, Brady Poppinga, Greg Jennings, Daryn Colledge, Jason Spitz, Tony Moll, and Nick Collins.</p><p></p><p>These guys are going to improve. To think they are not and we are going to hold at 8-8 is farfetched. Now I'll take the assessment that the Packers might get better but they overachieved because of an easy schedule last year. I'll take the assessment that they'll get better but the schedule is much harder on paper. However the assessment that they'll be the same because they didn't do anything in free agency is mind blowing. It’s like you expect 0 improvement from the coaching staff, the youth, and guys like Nick Barnett who should hit his prime right about now. </p><p></p><p>I actually agree that the Packers are an average team but at the very least the potential is there. </p><p></p><p>The thing that bugs me Pyle is you talk this guy up to be a “true journalists” yet when Peter King says something you disagree with you make a sarcastic remark. </p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.packerforum.com/index.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=10285" target="_blank">http://www.packerforum.com/index.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=10285</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Uhm actually it was one person </p><p></p><p>You want a true journalist and an NFL insider it’s Peter King who arguably is the best in the biz. Sorry but I remeber you stating that and when I saw you stick up for Oates it just made my shake my head. Are the right guys for the job the ones that agree with you? That's what it looks like to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="porky88, post: 144368, member: 489"] I don't think you can look at the Packers and say this team isn't going to be any better because they didn't bring anyone in. That assessment is ridiculous in my opinion. Now I agree the Packers aren't going to win the Super Bowl and they'll probably win 7 to 9 games but I see no reason why someone can't predict 9-7 and a wild card birth in the NFC which is the JV league of the NFL. Does that make you a homer? The Packers started a bunch of young players. A.J. Hawk, Corey Williams, Cullen Jenkins, Brady Poppinga, Greg Jennings, Daryn Colledge, Jason Spitz, Tony Moll, and Nick Collins. These guys are going to improve. To think they are not and we are going to hold at 8-8 is farfetched. Now I'll take the assessment that the Packers might get better but they overachieved because of an easy schedule last year. I'll take the assessment that they'll get better but the schedule is much harder on paper. However the assessment that they'll be the same because they didn't do anything in free agency is mind blowing. It’s like you expect 0 improvement from the coaching staff, the youth, and guys like Nick Barnett who should hit his prime right about now. I actually agree that the Packers are an average team but at the very least the potential is there. The thing that bugs me Pyle is you talk this guy up to be a “true journalists” yet when Peter King says something you disagree with you make a sarcastic remark. [url=http://www.packerforum.com/index.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=10285]http://www.packerforum.com/index.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=10285[/url] Uhm actually it was one person You want a true journalist and an NFL insider it’s Peter King who arguably is the best in the biz. Sorry but I remeber you stating that and when I saw you stick up for Oates it just made my shake my head. Are the right guys for the job the ones that agree with you? That's what it looks like to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 11:09 PM
Draft Talk
Kentucky Derby Day!
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 8:00 PM
All Other Sports
Transfer Portal and How It Has Changed College Sports
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 7:44 PM
College Sports
C
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 2:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 2:24 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers 8-8 this year?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top