Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="sschind" data-source="post: 933066" data-attributes="member: 10247">Yup, and some people will still ***** if those 4 all pros were not the first 4 picksHe's been waiting a long time for just the right time to bring up Jeff Janis, Just let him have his moment in the sun.If you are drafting a kicker with #12 you shouldn't be around to draft that QB at #241 the next year. (just trying to beat Schultz before he says it)  I understand the higher expectation that comes with a higher draft pick and that's fine I have higher expectations for them as well.  It's just that I prefer to look at results when judging a player who has been in the league for a few years.  To put a different spin on it lets say you draft a RB with your first round pick and another with your 7th round pick.  Your offense is geared to a RB by committee approach so both get a lot of playing time and after 3 years both RBs have racked up surprisingly similar stats and were considered to be in the upper third of RBs in the league .  You would say because less draft capital was used on him and the expectations for him to succeed were less that the 7th rounder was a better pick and I can see why you would think that.  To me though a pick is a pick and both were good picks.  Yes I would rather have more higher picks because like I said the odds they pan out are greater but in the end the result are all that matter.</blockquote>

Total: 1,274 (members: 2, guests: 1,272)