H
HardRightEdge
Guest
A stroke could be a "stoke of genius", no?Enlighten me. I thought a stroke WAS a brain stroke.
A stroke could be a "stoke of genius", no?Enlighten me. I thought a stroke WAS a brain stroke.
I hope TT keeps the pick. When is the last time the Packers had the first pick of the 2nd round and with some quality players still available?
Make the pick Ted.
The idea of "talent tier" is a little broad once the pick is imminent. I think it's more a case of having a small handful of players they would have been targeting at #29 based on the their initial projections of how the board would fall and as it turned out enough of them were still unpicked. It's an example of staying true to the board.This is a paricularily deep draft. We are in a talent tier getting the same value at 33 as 29. To me, we just got a free pick. There will be players available in the 4th that the Packers had the same grade on selected in the 2nd round last year.
My guess is that TT feels the team needs better CB play rather than a highly-rated CB obtained via the draft. Otherwise, why trade down instead of up? Also, he may feel that a better pass rush will contribute to better CB play. We can't ever go by what he says, only by what he does and then try to sort it out without hearing any revealing details (from him). He's a tough nut to crack by his own design. He's not a fan-pleasing GM unless we have an abundance of tar and feathers to get rid of.are BIGGEST NEED is STILL cornerback honestly lol.... it's not a linebacker....
I wouldn't either. Perine is a monster. Pound for pound, maybe the strongest player in the draft this year with underappreciated vision. He isn't a burner but has enough juice to break a long gainer. He put up really solid numbers even though he split carries with Mixon. Plus he's a great kid with his head on straight. He would make a nice compliment to Monty and be a load to take on come 3rd/4th and short and late game situations.Wouldn't mind going bowser then Witherspoon then perine in the third
I see little in the King-Sherman comparison other than height and hops. Sherman is twitchy and physical, long on technique compensating for somewhat below average in speed. People tend to forget Sherman ran 4.60 / 4.53 at the Combine / Pro Day but it turned out the on-field football skills were off the charts.You and I are thinking a like then
King, who has been compared to Sherman, would be great
And then a 3rd and/or 4th round pick(s) package for Sherman would be FANTASTIC
I'm sure it would be doable as Sherman's value has dropped substantially
Witherspoon has many of the same attributes King has but at a lower price tag. Bowser is going to be a player once he figures it out. The kid hasn't played a ton of ball and has only begun to scratch the surface of his talent IMO. Tonight should be interesting...Wouldn't mind going bowser then Witherspoon then perine in the third
With virtually a whole day on the phones for this pick, I'd be shocked if TT does not add at least another 3rd to the mix.A totally expected and wise trade, I'd say.
As for what comes next, if we pick, it's got to be King or Wilson imo. Although I wouldn't be surprised to see us move again. I trust Ted, seems like I might be in the minority.
The Packers are viscerally averse to taking RBs in the first round. Now we're in the 2nd.!Great trade. Packers will likely be taking the player at 33 that they were planning on at 29. I am leaning towards Chidobe over King. If its Mixon, I would be only mildly surprised. It will not be cook or Lamp. If we can pick up another 4th by dropping another 4-5 picks, do it!
Enlighten me. I thought a stroke WAS a brain stroke.
The Packers are viscerally averse to taking RBs in the first round. Now we're in the 2nd.!
Seriously, though, Mixon would be a surprise at #33 given the NFL's posture toward violence against women. Call me cynical, but what this is about is women being the last frontier in a nearly saturated market.
Banning Mixon from the Combine is a message to owners that you are not to reward this guy. Kraft, for example, has embraced the PR line in taking him off his board altogether. Kraft is a man of highest moral standards (as is his GM), doncha know, being a football gambling entrepreneur. Surely many others with less league clout have followed. While there is certainly no memo from the league stating "don't reward this guy or else", there is a clear message being sent. Some. but not many, owners, would risk finding out what the "or else" consequence might lurk if they go against league messaging.
Setting aside the whole PR thing, while this incident is not in the least excusable, it should be taken into account that it happened nearly 3 years ago when the guy was 18 with no repeat offenses we're aware of. There is reason to believe this was a one-off reflexive reaction to being pushed and slapped.
Thompson interviewed the guy. When he's done so in the past with high grade/black mark guys, he's never taken the guy in line with his grade.
The Packer play on Mixon is probably one where if Thompson is satisfied with Mixon's mea culpas (I know I am) and he falls far enough to meet the PR threshold of punishment, then you might see the pick. How far down might that be? I think at least the 3rd. round where the money isn't much more than the rookie minimum.
Wouldn't that be something. A very talented player with a big 4 year chip on his shoulder in getting to the real money.
One of your best posts. thought provoking and insightful. Only thing I would argue with is the 3rd round threshold. I'm thinking 2nd round, pick 33.The Packers are viscerally averse to taking RBs in the first round. Now we're in the 2nd.!
Seriously, though, Mixon would be a surprise at #33 given the NFL's posture toward violence against women. Call me cynical, but what this is about is women being the last frontier in a nearly saturated market.
Banning Mixon from the Combine is a message to owners that you are not to reward this guy. Kraft, for example, has embraced the PR line in taking him off his board altogether. Kraft is a man of highest moral standards (as is his GM), doncha know, being a football gambling entrepreneur. Surely many others with less league clout have followed. While there is certainly no memo from the league stating "don't reward this guy or else", there is a clear message being sent. Some. but not many, owners, would risk finding out what the "or else" consequence might lurk if they go against league messaging.
Setting aside the whole PR thing, while this incident is not in the least excusable, it should be taken into account that it happened nearly 3 years ago when the guy was 18 with no repeat offenses we're aware of. There is reason to believe this was a one-off reflexive reaction to being pushed and slapped.
Thompson interviewed the guy. When he's done so in the past with high grade/black mark guys, he's never taken the guy in line with his grade. I can't recall him taking such a guy. Maybe he hasn't liked the interviews; maybe they didn't fall far enough.
The Packer play on Mixon is probably one where if Thompson is satisfied with Mixon's mea culpas (I know I am) and he falls far enough to meet the PR threshold of punishment, then you might see the pick. How far down might that be? I think at least the 3rd. round where the money isn't much more than the rookie minimum. That's a lot of punishment.
Wouldn't that be something? A very talented player with a big 4 year chip on his shoulder in getting to the real money.
Well, I look at it this way:One of your best posts. thought provoking and insightful. Only thing I would argue with is the 3rd round threshold. I'm thinking 2nd round, pick 33.
It definitely needs to be handled quickly and carefully by the Packer PR people.
Mixon needs to say some things upon being picked about regretting and embarrassed by the event. Announce he is going to volunteer at woman's shelters and give to causes, and then say he feels a new sense of responsibility/maturity and wants to make the world a better place. Be humble, own it, and move beyond it. Talk to kids about respecting woman. All sorts of things.
Turn the negative into a positive.
Can't forget about Dalvin Cook and Quincy Wilson, also. I think dropping a few more spots and picking up another 4th or 5th rd pick would be ideal, with all this talent still there.Now you're sitting at 33 with Willis, Bowser, King, Awuzie, Kamara and Lamp all on the board. And if they're OK with the off-field issues, Mixon and McDowell are there as well. They could ostensibly trade down again and still get a guy from that tier.
Can't forget about Dalvin Cook and Quincy Wilson, also. I think dropping a few more spots and picking up another 4th or 5th rd pick would be ideal, with all this talent still there.
If the Packers take Mixon at 33 I'm jumping on the fire TT bandwagon.
He's not even the best RB available, the PR hit will be horrible and there are simply better players at bigger needs available. Even if there was no video of this guy being a supreme ****** I wouldn't touch him before the mid/late 2nd.
Sorry he's not "Adrian Peterson with hands" as one particular poster mentioned. (Nevermind that would imply he's going to be the best RB of all time)
There are more then a few guys we can draft before Mixon should even be considered
Cook has many off field concerns, just none on video. I'm not a big fan of him either, but considering he's still there, he may be on TT's board.Just me, but I can forget about Cook all day long. No thanks.