Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Greg C." data-source="post: 14372" data-attributes="member: 195">This guy is a little harsh on Favre, but I cautiously agree with him on Rodgers.  I don't think it's going out on a limb to project him as the #2 this year.  To me, he already looks like he's as good as Nall on the field and ahead of Nall in the eyes of the coaches.  And of course he has WAY more upside.  If Rodgers does well it will give the team a shot of energy, even if he's not able to get any real playing time this year.  It will increase confidence in the management, the coaching staff, and the team's future.  Think of the QB merry-go-rounds that teams like the Bears have had for the past decade or more.  It would be great to be able to avoid that.  As for Peter King's comment that Favre "looks old," I wonder if that was taken out of context.  Did King mean that Favre looks old when he's out on the field playing or just that he looks old in the face?  (Which he clearly does, at least by professional athlete standards.)</blockquote>

Total: 581 (members: 4, guests: 577)