Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packernation Speaks Out
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greg C." data-source="post: 14372" data-attributes="member: 195"><p>This guy is a little harsh on Favre, but I cautiously agree with him on Rodgers. I don't think it's going out on a limb to project him as the #2 this year. To me, he already looks like he's as good as Nall on the field and ahead of Nall in the eyes of the coaches. And of course he has WAY more upside. If Rodgers does well it will give the team a shot of energy, even if he's not able to get any real playing time this year. It will increase confidence in the management, the coaching staff, and the team's future. Think of the QB merry-go-rounds that teams like the Bears have had for the past decade or more. It would be great to be able to avoid that. </p><p></p><p>As for Peter King's comment that Favre "looks old," I wonder if that was taken out of context. Did King mean that Favre looks old when he's out on the field playing or just that he looks old in the face? (Which he clearly does, at least by professional athlete standards.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greg C., post: 14372, member: 195"] This guy is a little harsh on Favre, but I cautiously agree with him on Rodgers. I don't think it's going out on a limb to project him as the #2 this year. To me, he already looks like he's as good as Nall on the field and ahead of Nall in the eyes of the coaches. And of course he has WAY more upside. If Rodgers does well it will give the team a shot of energy, even if he's not able to get any real playing time this year. It will increase confidence in the management, the coaching staff, and the team's future. Think of the QB merry-go-rounds that teams like the Bears have had for the past decade or more. It would be great to be able to avoid that. As for Peter King's comment that Favre "looks old," I wonder if that was taken out of context. Did King mean that Favre looks old when he's out on the field playing or just that he looks old in the face? (Which he clearly does, at least by professional athlete standards.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
edensmage
Firethorn1001
Schultz
PackerDNA
Arodgers12
Latest posts
2024 Packers Top 30 Prospect Visits
Latest: Dantés
18 minutes ago
Draft Talk
If you were GM, what is your ideal draft?
Latest: Dantés
Today at 12:57 PM
Draft Talk
S
The Packers All-Personality Team
Latest: Schultz
Today at 12:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Schultz
Today at 12:29 PM
Draft Talk
H
Dark Horse Candidates
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 12:23 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packernation Speaks Out
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top