J_J_kewl_aids
Cheesehead
i think that the packers will go 10 and 6 if rodgers dosnt get hurt.
I love me some prodictions.
That photo is PRICELESS!!!tromadz said:I love me some prodictions.
You must be logged in to see this image or video!:lol:
To topic.. I am going to say 10-6 as well.. Rodgers / Grant go down.. .500 at best.. that is right now.. unless someone in camp steps up and proves that we have depth.. which has a good chance of happening.
Read More....Just imagine how fans of the Patriots or Colts would feel if Tom Brady and Peyton Manning decided to walk away from the game this offseason. They’d be frantic - and with good reason. So why is it that many Packers fans seem so calm in the aftermath of Brett Favre’s surprising retirement? After all, one could make a strong argument that No. 4 was the third-best quarterback in the entire league in 2007 - just behind the aforementioned Brady and Manning. “With Aaron Rodgers, Green Bay is better equipped to move forward than either New England or Indianapolis,” said a former scout, "but I think it’s naive to think that Favre won’t be greatly missed. He meant more to that team that even his most ardent fans could imagine.”
So does that mean Green Bay is destined to go 6-10 in 2008? Probably not, but fans might need to lower their expectations some..."That’s why I’d consider 9-7 be a very good first season sans Favre.”
0-16.
OK, just kidding. Honestly I think 9-7 or 8-8. No bashing me because I am a Vikings fan... that is my honest to God objective prediction for Green Bay this year.
Green Bay does have the advantage of playing the Bears and the Lions twice, or it would definately have been 8-8. To think that Green Bay can mimic the success it had last year is pretty bold. Rodgers isn't bad, but he isn't Fav-re, and the team is going to feel it in the w-l record.
And this isn't just purple glasses, I think the Vikings are going to be 9-7 or 8-8 as well... which makes that first game oh so much more important.
NodakPaul said:0-16.
OK, just kidding. Honestly I think 9-7 or 8-8. No bashing me because I am a Vikings fan... that is my honest to God objective prediction for Green Bay this year.
Green Bay does have the advantage of playing the Bears and the Lions twice, or it would definately have been 8-8. To think that Green Bay can mimic the success it had last year is pretty bold. Rodgers isn't bad, but he isn't Fav-re, and the team is going to feel it in the w-l record.
And this isn't just purple glasses, I think the Vikings are going to be 9-7 or 8-8 as well... which makes that first game oh so much more important.
I said 10-6 because Favre gives us +3 games a year (just a wild guess). No Favre, instead of 13-3 last year, we'd be 10-6. With pretty much the same team as last year...
Yeah.....that "Fav-re" gave you fits, didn't he? (Kinda like that "Tar-king-ton" did to me back in the day!) :wink:Zombieslayer said:NodakPaul said:0-16.
OK, just kidding. Honestly I think 9-7 or 8-8. No bashing me because I am a Vikings fan... that is my honest to God objective prediction for Green Bay this year.
Green Bay does have the advantage of playing the Bears and the Lions twice, or it would definately have been 8-8. To think that Green Bay can mimic the success it had last year is pretty bold. Rodgers isn't bad, but he isn't Fav-re, and the team is going to feel it in the w-l record.
And this isn't just purple glasses, I think the Vikings are going to be 9-7 or 8-8 as well... which makes that first game oh so much more important.
I said 10-6 because Favre gives us +3 games a year (just a wild guess). No Favre, instead of 13-3 last year, we'd be 10-6. With pretty much the same team as last year...
That could be a fair estimate. I might be over-valuing Fav-re, but then again I did have the misery of watching him come back in the 4th time and time again...
I think you meant grammAr. :lol:tromadz said:I love me some prodictions.
You must be logged in to see this image or video!:lol:
.
HEY!!!!15-1
You heard it here first.
BTW Vikings fan, you may have a good DL but you still have a ultra toned down version of Michael Vick who can throw about as good as me.
0-16.
OK, just kidding. Honestly I think 9-7 or 8-8. No bashing me because I am a Vikings fan... that is my honest to God objective prediction for Green Bay this year.
Green Bay does have the advantage of playing the Bears and the Lions twice, or it would definately have been 8-8. To think that Green Bay can mimic the success it had last year is pretty bold. Rodgers isn't bad, but he isn't Fav-re, and the team is going to feel it in the w-l record.
And this isn't just purple glasses, I think the Vikings are going to be 9-7 or 8-8 as well... which makes that first game oh so much more important.
I think you meant grammAr. :lol:Pack93z said:tromadz said:I love me some prodictions.
You must be logged in to see this image or video!:lol:
.
Yes....it IS! Isn't it? Mein furher! :lol:That is the creepiest thing I've ever seen in my life. That's creepier than Nurse Cheesey.