Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packer report - FA's still out there!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="all about da packers" data-source="post: 53996" data-attributes="member: 227"><p>Actually, one of the articles I read made a very good point. It basically said that there must be a reason that TT is not going after Peterson, and that reason could be MM, since MM came over from San Fran., who would know more him. A very true statement, IMO.</p><p></p><p>And digs, the thing about T.O. is that he would isntantly upgrade our WR crops. In Philly, he behaved his first year, so perhaps if the Packers do get him, he will be an ok lockerroom person for year 1. And I wouldn't be opposed to the idea of signing TO to a one year contract, but of course that might just encourage TO to act disruptive once again. But I drool at the possibility of having a Driver/TO/Walker WR set. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/biggrin.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="all about da packers, post: 53996, member: 227"] Actually, one of the articles I read made a very good point. It basically said that there must be a reason that TT is not going after Peterson, and that reason could be MM, since MM came over from San Fran., who would know more him. A very true statement, IMO. And digs, the thing about T.O. is that he would isntantly upgrade our WR crops. In Philly, he behaved his first year, so perhaps if the Packers do get him, he will be an ok lockerroom person for year 1. And I wouldn't be opposed to the idea of signing TO to a one year contract, but of course that might just encourage TO to act disruptive once again. But I drool at the possibility of having a Driver/TO/Walker WR set. :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
Magooch
Pkrjones
Latest posts
2024 Round 7, pick 255 (compensatory): Kalen King, CB
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 6:35 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
What's life really like in Green Bay?
Latest: King of Jeans
Today at 4:51 PM
The Green Bay Life
S
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Sunshinepacker
Today at 3:38 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 1:46 PM
Draft Talk
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 1:06 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packer report - FA's still out there!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top