Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="warhawk" data-source="post: 136265" data-attributes="member: 431">This is another article that is purely individual perspective on a given topic.I can easily counter much of this with my perspective that the Packers SHOULD have been 10-6. We were gifted (given away by our opponents) no games and yet we gave away TWO games at the least. I am speaking of games we clearly outplayed the other team in every way yet lost. It cannot be said the season "evened" out with wins we never should have had. That didn't happen.Yes, we were clearly outplayed in three consecutive games. IF memory serves me correctly Indy was getting kicked so badly there for a stretch they were considered no playoff threat what so ever.They came around. We came around also but the hole we were in was deeper than theirs. My point is we played as well as anyone out there on the Defensive side of the ball the last part of the season. Other supposed "better" teams did not shut down the last four teams we played like we did.That's a big start. It should also be noted that the odds are now no longer in the Bears favor for post season success. EVERY year the SB runner ups look good the following year only to fall on their faces. Smart money won't go there.So who then do you look to in the NFC? I look to the Green Bay Packers. They have as legitimate of a shot as any team out there (whom all, by the way, have their own concerns to deal with).</blockquote>

Total: 358 (members: 3, guests: 355)