Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pack needs a lot more than Favre to contend
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="retiredgrampa" data-source="post: 136257" data-attributes="member: 338"><p>Not a bad summary, Vikesrule. Obviously, I hope for the best but I believe we are two strong drafts and a few good FAs away from contending. Our weak areas (TE, FS, depth) are VERY weak will take time to overhaul. I happen to believe that FA could cover those areas but Ted Thompson is reluctant to make full use of it. So, the crapshoot that is the draft will probably be utilized with mixed results. So much also depends on our young OL. If it doesn't improve, neither will our W-L column. I agree that Favre's return does NOT guarantee better results than last year. It only assures us of a QB who will most likely complete just over 50% of his passes and a QB rating around 72. Hardly inspiring IMO. So, a better running game is the only way we can hope to improve our record. We will be very competitive in our division but outside of it is another question. We will not be a come-from-behind team once again, so it behooves us to get the early lead and hang onto it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="retiredgrampa, post: 136257, member: 338"] Not a bad summary, Vikesrule. Obviously, I hope for the best but I believe we are two strong drafts and a few good FAs away from contending. Our weak areas (TE, FS, depth) are VERY weak will take time to overhaul. I happen to believe that FA could cover those areas but Ted Thompson is reluctant to make full use of it. So, the crapshoot that is the draft will probably be utilized with mixed results. So much also depends on our young OL. If it doesn't improve, neither will our W-L column. I agree that Favre's return does NOT guarantee better results than last year. It only assures us of a QB who will most likely complete just over 50% of his passes and a QB rating around 72. Hardly inspiring IMO. So, a better running game is the only way we can hope to improve our record. We will be very competitive in our division but outside of it is another question. We will not be a come-from-behind team once again, so it behooves us to get the early lead and hang onto it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
Half Empty
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: gopkrs
9 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:07 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:43 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Half Empty
Today at 8:32 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 7:44 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pack needs a lot more than Favre to contend
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top