Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
NFL Discussions
Overtime Rule change for playoffs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Heyjoe4" data-source="post: 955507" data-attributes="member: 13032"><p>Now this is very well stated. I think a lot of fans have been unhappy with OT rules for years, especially "sudden death". And you're right about technology. And like all technology, it works well when it addresses a need. The review of pass interference is a good example. It may have addressed a need for fans (although probably not in the end), but the referees certainly didn't want it. And when you're asking the person who made the call to review it, along with 50 others, it's painful and slows down the game and doesn't add much. The refs get the majority of their calls right, a minor miracle.</p><p></p><p>But yeah fans are gonna expect the game to keep up. It's come a long way from watching Bart Starr sneak in a TD in living, grainy black and white many years ago. No challenge flags back then and who would have used it. Players and coaches and refs wanted to save as many limbs as they could at that point. And it WAS a TD thanks to Jerry Kramer and Bart.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Heyjoe4, post: 955507, member: 13032"] Now this is very well stated. I think a lot of fans have been unhappy with OT rules for years, especially "sudden death". And you're right about technology. And like all technology, it works well when it addresses a need. The review of pass interference is a good example. It may have addressed a need for fans (although probably not in the end), but the referees certainly didn't want it. And when you're asking the person who made the call to review it, along with 50 others, it's painful and slows down the game and doesn't add much. The refs get the majority of their calls right, a minor miracle. But yeah fans are gonna expect the game to keep up. It's come a long way from watching Bart Starr sneak in a TD in living, grainy black and white many years ago. No challenge flags back then and who would have used it. Players and coaches and refs wanted to save as many limbs as they could at that point. And it WAS a TD thanks to Jerry Kramer and Bart. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:12 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 10:57 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 3:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 2:00 PM
Movies and Entertainment
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Magooch
Yesterday at 11:43 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
NFL Discussions
Overtime Rule change for playoffs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top