Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Overall Graft Grades, PF "experts"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 831115" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>It's very odd to me that so many people think that this pick was a reach based on "expert" opinions. </p><p></p><p>This is bizarre when you consider where many "experts" ranked him before the draft.</p><p></p><p><strong>Lance Zierlein: </strong>7th</p><p></p><p><strong>Daniel Jeremiah: </strong>10th</p><p></p><p><strong>Dane Brugler: </strong>13th</p><p></p><p>I am not telling anyone to feel differently about this pick based on these guys. You all might feel good or bad about these analysts... I don't know.</p><p></p><p>All I'm saying is that a number of reputable analysts had Gary right in the range of pick #12, if not a little earlier. And yet many people are labeling him a reach based on pre-draft projection. It's a confusing contradiction.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 831115, member: 12283"] It's very odd to me that so many people think that this pick was a reach based on "expert" opinions. This is bizarre when you consider where many "experts" ranked him before the draft. [B]Lance Zierlein: [/B]7th [B]Daniel Jeremiah: [/B]10th [B]Dane Brugler: [/B]13th I am not telling anyone to feel differently about this pick based on these guys. You all might feel good or bad about these analysts... I don't know. All I'm saying is that a number of reputable analysts had Gary right in the range of pick #12, if not a little earlier. And yet many people are labeling him a reach based on pre-draft projection. It's a confusing contradiction. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Firethorn1001
tynimiller
weeds
Green_Bay_Packers
PackerinSD
Latest posts
If you were GM, what is your ideal draft?
Latest: Dantés
A moment ago
Draft Talk
S
The Packers All-Personality Team
Latest: Schultz
22 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Schultz
27 minutes ago
Draft Talk
H
Dark Horse Candidates
Latest: Heyjoe4
34 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Free Agency Thread
Latest: Sanguine camper
Today at 11:56 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Overall Graft Grades, PF "experts"
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top