Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 787213" data-attributes="member: 7261">For lack of a better place to put this, as well an not wanting it to get much traction and turn into another Mack post, I found this article so comical, I have to wonder if the author is legit or he wrote it satirically?Why would the Packers want to trade for Le'Veon Bell and give up what would no doubt be a first rounder and perhaps more plus a pile of cash (Bell wants $17M)?  Yes, he is/was a great RB, but much like Mack, the pick might be worth it, but IMO not the salary.  Some might argue that the Packers are too one dimensional on offense by relying heavy on the passing game, but when you have AR at QB, why not?  It seems to work well and anything we get out of the running game is just gravy.  I'm fine with Williams, Jones and Monty....their combined salaries is around $2M.<a href="http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000961165/article/unpopular-opinions-packers-should-trade-for-leveon-bell" target="_blank">http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000961165/article/unpopular-opinions-packers-should-trade-for-leveon-bell</a></blockquote>

Total: 1,489 (members: 3, guests: 1,486)