Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 680037" data-attributes="member: 7261">Always a few of those every year, glad this one worked in our favor.  I recall a Fail Mary against Seattle that didn't, even after it was reviewed.I wouldn't be opposed to having certain penalties reviewable (if challenged), in a timely fashion.  But some of them are strict judgement calls which can vary from official to official, so the consistency of what constitutes PI should first be addressed.  I also think it should have to come as a challenge from the coach.  Otherwise, officials in the booth could find pass interference/holding etc. occurring on too many plays, at or away from the ball.  If they buzzed down to correct each one, the game would go 6 hours and if they didn't, someone would complain at how many they missed.</blockquote>

Total: 341 (members: 4, guests: 337)