GVN2FLY
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2011
- Messages
- 62
- Reaction score
- 12
Holy Molly, Flyn is setting records -- this does not look for Rodgers.
No. Peyton was not rusty in 2009. He was rusty in 2005 but they rested in 2005 for TWO games since they clinched early.
It may hurt Rodgers MVP case though to see Flynn tear it up today and all.
However look on the plus side. If Rodgers loses MVP (and I still don't think he should) the last person to win MVP and then the SB I think was Kurt Warner in 1999.
It won't hurt Rodgers when Flynn was making absolutely beautiful throws. It's not like Flynn and Rodgers were dining and dunking around.Holy Molly, Flyn is setting records -- this does not look for Rodgers.
it was probly the best move although idk about having two weeks off... i hope hes not rusty come playoff time but this is exactly what happened to peyton in 09.. but yea this MURDERED his chances to win the MVP with the game brees had.. i just cant really see him winning with the season brees had.. he wins pretty much every major statistical category.. oh well we better just get the championship
It won't hurt Rodgers when Flynn was making absolutely beautiful throws. It's not like Flynn and Rodgers were dining and dunking around.
If you take the numbers and average them out by the games played and even further break it down to the fact that Rodgers was pulled very early in two games, then Rodgers' season is more impressive. I can't place too much stock on manufactured numbers like New Orleans has done for Brees. He has remained in the game during blowouts and still throwing.
I think I would be alot more happier to know how the NFL defines a MVP Canidate.. By stats or by the importance to team.
If both its deffiently Rodgers, if stats brees. Importance Rodgers ( Saints have a good RB)
But again that brings the loophole of Manning being the MVP...
Also AR only had 2 games indoors?
Drew had at least 8
Holy Molly, Flyn is setting records -- this does not look for Rodgers.
Shot to break more records?Drew has been sacked over 20 times this year.
I think people just don't want to admit he deserves an MVP vote, and it's always some excuses to down the guy. So if he does win it this year, I'll be expecting more threads like this.
I laughed at this write up. Brees has average WRs with the exception of Graham and Sproles and you're saying Tebow has a better shot at MVP than Brees? Where's your respect?
If Brees does win it, he deserves it. Higher completion percentage, shot to break more records, and on top of that I have to hear people *****ing about how he don't deserve it. I watch the Saints every week and Brees is like a surgeon on the field. It's really funny to me the people that talk **** about him don't even watch the Saints, yet love to bring up the Rams game or the Tampa Bay one. Those Saints fans on here could easily constantly throw the Chiefs game up, or better yet the tons of games this year where our offense has been out gained because our defense is total crap.
Brees is really the underdog. He's 11-3, Pack is 13-1, and people talk like Brees is some lucky bastard in this league cause they don't want to accept he is really good, and possibly deserves an MVP. If he wins, he totally deserves it. he has played lights out this season.
Why do people worry about the MVP anyway? No one gave a **** about the pro bowl snubs last year. I didn't hear a word about people saying Rodgers was snubbed for Ryan last year in the Pro Bowl. You should be more worried about the Super Bowl rather than *****ing about how much you hate the Saints and Brees. Oh god Brees is going to win the MVP, we're done!
The real MVP is the SB MVP. That much I agree.i agree jules that if rodgers has to lose the MVP so that he can get to the SB, than SO BE IT.
MVP meanings NOTHING if u don't win the SB IMO (or atleast make it that far).
Imagine rodgers losing the MVP to brees... than playing the saints in the NFCG and lighting them up.
He sure would prove who the real mvp is..
Shot to break more records?
Rodgers broke the record for passer rating in a season, for most 100+ rating games in a season, for most 110+ rating games in a season, for lowest INT %, lowest ints thrown for 400+ attempts, and most touchdowns throughout 15 games (48, counting 3 running TDs).
Peter King is polling for the MVP, give him your opinion please.
https://twitter.com/#!/SI_PeterKing
Brees made it a horse race, and more than that. In the end, early this morning, I struggled with what to do with my vote, one of 50 for the annual Associated Press NFL awards and All-Pro team. I could go Brees, or I could go Rodgers, or I could, as I've done before, split my vote half and half. I thought a lot about doing that, and I can see why some voters might do that. Unlike baseball, the football MVP is done by voting for first place. Not first, second and third, or more than that. Just one vote. So that was a consideration in a very tight race.Brees has had, arguably, the greatest statistical offensive season a quarterback has ever had, with the most passing yards, the best accuracy, and the fourth-most touchdowns in a season (46). Rodgers set the NFL mark for passer rating, became the first passer to have 12 straight games with a rating over 105, led the Packers to the best record in the league, and had the best passing season the Packers have ever seen -- which is saying something, considering their Hall of Fame heritage (Arnie Herber, Bart Starr and soon Brett Favre).Sometime after 5 this morning, I finalized my call. I decided not to split the vote, because I thought it would be a cop out. I felt I had to make a decision. And I picked Rodgers. Four reasons:1. I thought Rodgers was better for the full season. Rodgers was 14-1, Brees 13-3. So much can go into wins and losses, and each man did more than any on his team to lead to those wins. But in the two midseason losses that ultimately cost the Saints the second seed in the playoffs, Brees was less than perfect, and it hurt his team. In a six-point loss to Tampa Bay in Week 6, Brees threw one interception late in the first half that Josh Freeman turned into a touchdown three plays later. Late in the fourth quarter, down six, Brees threw an interception in the end zone. Two weeks later, New Orleans went to St. Louis and lost by 10 to A.J. Feeley and the Rams. Brees threw one interception that was returned for a touchdown, and the other was turned into a touchdown pass by Feeley. In Rodgers' first 12 weeks of the season, he ground up every opponent with remarkable efficiency, throwing 37 touchdowns with just five interceptions ... almost the same way Brees played at the end of the season. In the last eight games, Brees was as brilliant as Rodgers was for the first 12. The Saints were 8-0, and he threw 27 touchdowns with four interceptions, and was a paragon of accuracy. But those two losses to, as it turned out, 4-12 and 2-14 teams, with Brees mistakes a factor, weighed on my decision. In the end, it was like watching two almost perfect skaters, and one lands the quad and one has a perfect program except for double-footing the landing on one jump.2. Brees had five multiple-interception games, Rodgers none. Not decisive, but a factor. I also thought the TD-to-interception differential (plus-39 for Rodgers, plus-32 for Brees) and the yards per attempt (9.25 to 8.33, in Rodgers' favor) was a factor.3. I wanted to respect statistics but not be overwhelmed by them. I have tremendous respect for Brees the team player, and I couldn't care less that he was throwing the ball up 22 with three minutes to play against Atlanta. All he's doing is executing the plays that are called. But I don't want numbers, some of which are exacerbated in blowouts like the 62-7 rout of the Colts (Brees) and 45-7 rout of the Vikings (Rodgers), to affect the vote unduly, particularly since Brees threw 155 more passes than Rodgers.4. Rodgers won the head-to-head matchup. Again, not overwhelming. But a brick in the wall.As for the Flynn performance, I think it could be evidence that it's the system and the supporting cast as much as the player that makes the quarterback in Green Bay. But how much stock do you put in one game? Is it anecdotal or absolutely proof? I think it's more of the former, but I just don't think we have enough proof. How do we know that if Chase Daniel, Brees' backup, started against the Panthers Sunday with all that talent around him in the passing game, and with a superb play-caller in Sean Payton who knows what Daniel does well and what he doesn't, that he wouldn't have thrown for 330 and four touchdowns? We don't.One of the things that bothers me about not voting for Brees is that I think, overall, he's been the best quarterback in football over the last six years, with a phenomenal record of achievement. And he hasn't won an MVP. I sincerely hope he does before he retires, and if he wins it this year, I won't be bothered at all, because Brees has been a great difference-maker this year. I just think Rodgers has been a little better for the full season.
And this:4 teams that won't survive without their quarterback
A. Colts (We already seen this 2-13, without Manning)
B. Saints (Realistically, they too have some defensive issues that are out of control in times)
C. Packers (31st ranked defense, without Rodgers, we'd be 3-13 at best)
D. Patriots (32nd ranked defense tells the tale.)
I am wondering if Bogart would like to “revise and extend” these remarks. After watching Flynn’s performance against the Lions, his play last year at New England can’t be categorized as a fluke. I don’t think the Packers are 15-1 without Rodgers but there is now tangible evidence leading one to conclude they wouldn’t be “3-13 at best”.I don't think we would be this far without Rodgers (14-1). If we lost him for a season, we'd probably have the same record Indy has without Peyton…